Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
Impaired motor cortex plasticity in patients with Noonan syndrome.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mainberger Florian, Zenker Martin, Jung Nikolai H, Delvendahl Igor, Brandt Antonia, Freudenberg Leonie, Heinen Florian, Mall Volker
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Noonan syndrome (NS; OMIM 163950) is a developmental disorder caused by activating mutations in various components of the RAS-MAPK pathway. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated impairment of synaptic plasticity caused by RAS-MAPK pathway hyperactivity. Induction of synaptic plasticity critically depends on the level of attention. We therefore studied the induction of synaptic plasticity in patients with NS and healthy volunteers under different conditions of attention using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
METHODS: We investigated 10 patients with NS and healthy controls (HC) using paired associative stimulation (PAS) with different attention levels (unspecific, visual and electrical attention control). Changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed immediately after as well as 30 and 60 min after PAS.
RESULTS: We demonstrated that MEP amplitudes of healthy controls significantly increased from 1.00 ± 0.17 to 1.74 ± 0.50 mV (p=0.001), which was not seen in patients with Noonan-Syndrome (0.88 ± 0.09 to 1.10 ± 0.48 mV, p=0.148) and there was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.003) when using an unspecific attention control. Under specific electrical attention control, MEP amplitudes decreased significantly in patients with NS, whereas a visual attention focus diminished synaptic plasticity in healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that synaptic plasticity is impaired in patients with NS, which is probably a consequence of constitutive activity of the RAS-MAPK pathway. The induction of synaptic plasticity in these patients critically depends on attention.
SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study that indicates reduced synaptic plasticity in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder. Our results may have direct implications for learning and memory strategies in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder.
METHODS: We investigated 10 patients with NS and healthy controls (HC) using paired associative stimulation (PAS) with different attention levels (unspecific, visual and electrical attention control). Changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed immediately after as well as 30 and 60 min after PAS.
RESULTS: We demonstrated that MEP amplitudes of healthy controls significantly increased from 1.00 ± 0.17 to 1.74 ± 0.50 mV (p=0.001), which was not seen in patients with Noonan-Syndrome (0.88 ± 0.09 to 1.10 ± 0.48 mV, p=0.148) and there was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.003) when using an unspecific attention control. Under specific electrical attention control, MEP amplitudes decreased significantly in patients with NS, whereas a visual attention focus diminished synaptic plasticity in healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that synaptic plasticity is impaired in patients with NS, which is probably a consequence of constitutive activity of the RAS-MAPK pathway. The induction of synaptic plasticity in these patients critically depends on attention.
SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study that indicates reduced synaptic plasticity in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder. Our results may have direct implications for learning and memory strategies in patients with a RAS-pathway disorder.