The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021
Development and validation of the Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction Dyspnea Index (EILODI).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Olin James Tod, Shaffer Monica, Nauman Emily, Durso Catherine S, Fan Elizabeth M, Staudenmayer Herman, Christopher Kent L, Gartner-Schmidt Jackie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) causes exertional dyspnea and is important for its effect on quality of life, diagnostic confusion with exercise-induced asthma, and health care resource utilization. There is no validated patient-reported outcome measure specific to EILO.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop, validate, and define a minimal clinically important difference for a patient-reported outcome measure to be used with adolescents and young adults with EILO.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary group created a preliminary measure, modified by a 10-member participant focus group, with 20 items scored along a 5-point Likert scale. A subsequent cohort of participants recruited from a clinic, aged 12 to 21 years, with confirmed EILO by continuous laryngoscopy during exercise testing (1) completed the measure at 3 points in time over 28 days and (2) provided anchoring data in the form of a daily exercise log and categorical self-assessments of clinical improvement. Thirty additional participants without exertional dyspnea served as controls.
RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen subjects with mild to severe EILO participated in the exploratory factor analysis, which identified 7 factors within the preliminary outcome measure. After a process of item reduction, a 12-item metric with a total score ranging from 0 to 48 was developed. Mean scores of patients with EILO and healthy controls at baseline were 28.8 ± 7.4 and 4.5 ± 7.4, respectively. A minimal clinically important difference of 6 was determined by comparison of index change with changes in categorical self-assessments of improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed for adolescents and young adults with EILO.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop, validate, and define a minimal clinically important difference for a patient-reported outcome measure to be used with adolescents and young adults with EILO.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary group created a preliminary measure, modified by a 10-member participant focus group, with 20 items scored along a 5-point Likert scale. A subsequent cohort of participants recruited from a clinic, aged 12 to 21 years, with confirmed EILO by continuous laryngoscopy during exercise testing (1) completed the measure at 3 points in time over 28 days and (2) provided anchoring data in the form of a daily exercise log and categorical self-assessments of clinical improvement. Thirty additional participants without exertional dyspnea served as controls.
RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen subjects with mild to severe EILO participated in the exploratory factor analysis, which identified 7 factors within the preliminary outcome measure. After a process of item reduction, a 12-item metric with a total score ranging from 0 to 48 was developed. Mean scores of patients with EILO and healthy controls at baseline were 28.8 ± 7.4 and 4.5 ± 7.4, respectively. A minimal clinically important difference of 6 was determined by comparison of index change with changes in categorical self-assessments of improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed for adolescents and young adults with EILO.