Variation in Practice Patterns of Current Rhinoplasty Surgeons for Nasal Valve Compromise.

Background

To compare practice patterns of rhinoplasty surgeons with the 2010 clinical consensus statements (CCSs) on nasal valve compromise (NVC) and delineate what variables may affect such practice patterns and consensus.

Methods

An online questionnaire pertaining to the 2010 CCS was administered at the Advances in Rhinoplasty meeting with responses based on a 9-point Likert scale.

Results

Of 580 participants, 113 completed the survey with the majority of statements in accordance between panelists and surveyors. Less than 10% of responses met discordance criteria. Significant differences in practice patterns exist when stratified by specialty, years-in-practice, geographic location, type of practice, and annual number of rhinoplasties performed.

Conclusion

There is a general concordance between practice patterns of active rhinoplasty surgeons and the 2010 CCS on NVC despite a decade of new studies in the interim. Significant differences, however, exist regarding the utility of diagnostic imaging, rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, and acoustic rhinomanometry in the evaluation of NVC. Furthermore, variables such as specialty, years in practice, annual number of rhinoplasties performed, practice setting, and geographic location significantly affect these perspectives and overall consensus.