Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2020
Evaluation of carpal tunnel release outcomes by the Japanese version of the carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire compared to an electrophysiological severity grade.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kanatani Takako, Harada Yoshifumi, Nagura Issei, Takase Fumiaki, Lucchina Stefano
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The outcome of carpal tunnel release (CTR) one year postoperatively was assessed by the Japanese version of Carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire, CTSI-JSSH. Patients were further graded by the electrophysiological severity scale and the CTSI-JSSH scores were compared amongst the Stages before surgery and one-year postoperatively.
METHODS: This study included 247 hands and the mean age of the patients was 68 years (range:26-91). They completed the CTSI-JSSH consisting of the two subscales of the symptom scale (CTSI-JSSH-SS) and the functional scale (CTSI-JSSH-FS) both preoperatively and at the follow-up period of one year. The change of the scores of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH were examined. Electrophysiological examination was performed before CTR and graded according to the electrophysiological severity scale as Stage 1-5. The scores of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH were compared amongst Stage 1-5.
RESULTS: All CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH scores improved significantly one-year postoperatively. Also, the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) showed large responsiveness, i.e. 1.36/1.43, 1.12/1.08 and 1.43/1.45 respectively. There was no significant difference in the score of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH amongst any of the Stages preoperatively, while the scores in Stage 5 were significantly inferior to the ones in Stages 3 and 4 one-year postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of CTR were favorable by assessment of the CTSI-JSSH. We suggest the postoperative inferior scores in Stage 5 may be due to the potential axonal damage which could explain the disappearance of distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity in Stage 5.
METHODS: This study included 247 hands and the mean age of the patients was 68 years (range:26-91). They completed the CTSI-JSSH consisting of the two subscales of the symptom scale (CTSI-JSSH-SS) and the functional scale (CTSI-JSSH-FS) both preoperatively and at the follow-up period of one year. The change of the scores of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH were examined. Electrophysiological examination was performed before CTR and graded according to the electrophysiological severity scale as Stage 1-5. The scores of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH were compared amongst Stage 1-5.
RESULTS: All CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH scores improved significantly one-year postoperatively. Also, the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) showed large responsiveness, i.e. 1.36/1.43, 1.12/1.08 and 1.43/1.45 respectively. There was no significant difference in the score of the CTSI-JSSH-SS, CTSI-JSSH-FS and total CTSI-JSSH amongst any of the Stages preoperatively, while the scores in Stage 5 were significantly inferior to the ones in Stages 3 and 4 one-year postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of CTR were favorable by assessment of the CTSI-JSSH. We suggest the postoperative inferior scores in Stage 5 may be due to the potential axonal damage which could explain the disappearance of distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity in Stage 5.