Clinical oral implants research · 2025
Evaluating the Effects of Dynamic Navigation on the Accuracy and Outcomes of the Autogenous Bone Ring Technique for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Yu-Chen, Zhu Ning, Liu Jiayu, Gao Xianming, Chen Gang, Zhang Yu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Autogenous bone ring technique (BRT) is a one-stage vertical augmentation approach with simultaneous implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of autogenous BRT assisted by dynamic navigation (DN) with freehand approach (FA) for vertical ridge augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients eligible for autogenous BRT were randomly assigned to DN or FA groups. Digital preoperative design was conducted for both groups. BRT surgeries were executed with or without the aid of DN in the two groups. Accuracy outcomes evaluated angular and linear deviations at the bone ring in the donor site (BR-D), recipient site (BR-R), and implant entry/apex between planned and actual positions revealed by cone-beam computed tomography. Vertical augmentation-related outcomes, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 6 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent surgery while one was lost to follow-up. The DN group showed significantly lower mean (SD) BR-R angular (3.58 [2.07] vs. 8.77 [4.20]°) and entry deviation (1.43 [0.51] vs. 2.01 [0.70] mm). For BR-D, the DN group had significantly lower angular (4.80 [2.62] vs. 12.97 [6.26]°), entry (1.45 [0.96] vs. 3.52 [1.54] mm), and apex deviation (1.28 [0.64] vs. 3.50 [1.47] mm) compared to the FA group. Implant angular deviation (3.74 [2.14] vs. 9.17 [4.39]°) and apex deviation (1.75 [0.44] vs. 2.35 [0.82] mm) was significantly lower in the DN group. In the FA group, one patient exhibited temporary lower lip hypoesthesia. No significant differences were observed in vertical bone gain, resorption, or patient-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to FA, DN may improve the accuracy of autogenous BRT procedures for vertical ridge augmentation while minimizing invasiveness.
TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn; Registration No. ChiCTR2200065585; registration date: 2022/11/09).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients eligible for autogenous BRT were randomly assigned to DN or FA groups. Digital preoperative design was conducted for both groups. BRT surgeries were executed with or without the aid of DN in the two groups. Accuracy outcomes evaluated angular and linear deviations at the bone ring in the donor site (BR-D), recipient site (BR-R), and implant entry/apex between planned and actual positions revealed by cone-beam computed tomography. Vertical augmentation-related outcomes, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 6 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent surgery while one was lost to follow-up. The DN group showed significantly lower mean (SD) BR-R angular (3.58 [2.07] vs. 8.77 [4.20]°) and entry deviation (1.43 [0.51] vs. 2.01 [0.70] mm). For BR-D, the DN group had significantly lower angular (4.80 [2.62] vs. 12.97 [6.26]°), entry (1.45 [0.96] vs. 3.52 [1.54] mm), and apex deviation (1.28 [0.64] vs. 3.50 [1.47] mm) compared to the FA group. Implant angular deviation (3.74 [2.14] vs. 9.17 [4.39]°) and apex deviation (1.75 [0.44] vs. 2.35 [0.82] mm) was significantly lower in the DN group. In the FA group, one patient exhibited temporary lower lip hypoesthesia. No significant differences were observed in vertical bone gain, resorption, or patient-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to FA, DN may improve the accuracy of autogenous BRT procedures for vertical ridge augmentation while minimizing invasiveness.
TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn; Registration No. ChiCTR2200065585; registration date: 2022/11/09).