Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2020
Validation of nursing outcome indicators of the nursing outcomes classification: dry eye severity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Araújo Mércio Gabriel de, Vitor Allyne Fortes, Silva Amanda Barbosa da, Carvalho Leandro Melo de, Alves Dase Luyza Barbosa de Sousa, Araújo Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To validate the content of the indicators of the nursing outcome Dry eye severity, of the Nursing Outcomes Classification, in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
METHODS: Methodological study of content validity, developed in two stages: the first, consisting of 23 specialists; and the second, of a consensus group formed by ten nurses. For analyzing the data in the first stage, we used the content validity index and binomial test for each indicator; in the second stage, the discussions of each meeting were transcripted, and the indicators that achieved 100% consensus were validated.
RESULTS: Of the 14 indicators evaluated by the specialists, 7 presented a cut-off point below 0.80, but did not show statistical significance in the binomial test. In the consensus group's validation, six indicators were reformulated.
CONCLUSION: This study considered the 14 indicators valid for evaluating patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
METHODS: Methodological study of content validity, developed in two stages: the first, consisting of 23 specialists; and the second, of a consensus group formed by ten nurses. For analyzing the data in the first stage, we used the content validity index and binomial test for each indicator; in the second stage, the discussions of each meeting were transcripted, and the indicators that achieved 100% consensus were validated.
RESULTS: Of the 14 indicators evaluated by the specialists, 7 presented a cut-off point below 0.80, but did not show statistical significance in the binomial test. In the consensus group's validation, six indicators were reformulated.
CONCLUSION: This study considered the 14 indicators valid for evaluating patients admitted to the intensive care unit.