Current opinion in hematology · 2010
Cord blood transplants: one, two or more units?
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avery Sharon, Barker Juliet N
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current status of double-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) to improve engraftment, reduce transplant-related mortality, and improve disease-free survival.
RECENT FINDINGS: Transplantation of cord blood provides a potentially curative therapy for many patients without a suitably human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor. Single-unit CBT outcomes have been compromised, however, in adults and larger children by limited cell dose. The introduction of double-unit CBT has improved engraftment and transplant-related mortality in adult patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies, with recent data also suggesting a protection against relapse. These improved outcomes are seen despite only a single unit being responsible for sustained donor hematopoiesis in nearly all patients. The study of double-unit CBT provides unique insights into transplant biology, with emerging data suggesting unit dominance is related to unit viability and unit-versus-unit immune interactions. Multiple unit CBT further serves as a platform to test novel graft manipulations.
SUMMARY: The development of double-unit CBT now allows the majority of patients, regardless of size or racial/ethnic background, access to transplant therapy. Ongoing investigation will serve to further improve outcomes and expand the role of CBT in the future.
RECENT FINDINGS: Transplantation of cord blood provides a potentially curative therapy for many patients without a suitably human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor. Single-unit CBT outcomes have been compromised, however, in adults and larger children by limited cell dose. The introduction of double-unit CBT has improved engraftment and transplant-related mortality in adult patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies, with recent data also suggesting a protection against relapse. These improved outcomes are seen despite only a single unit being responsible for sustained donor hematopoiesis in nearly all patients. The study of double-unit CBT provides unique insights into transplant biology, with emerging data suggesting unit dominance is related to unit viability and unit-versus-unit immune interactions. Multiple unit CBT further serves as a platform to test novel graft manipulations.
SUMMARY: The development of double-unit CBT now allows the majority of patients, regardless of size or racial/ethnic background, access to transplant therapy. Ongoing investigation will serve to further improve outcomes and expand the role of CBT in the future.