Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2012
Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: diagnostic impact of field of view.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rao Rohini, Jonsson Nina J, Ventura Camila, Gelman Rony, Lindquist Martin A, Casper Daniel S, Chiang Michael F
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of retinal field of view and magnification on interexpert reliability of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity.
METHODS: Fifteen wide-angle images from infants with retinopathy of prematurity were cropped and adjusted in magnification to create 2 additional image categories: medium angle (40°-50°) and narrow angle (20°-30°). These 45 images were uploaded to a Web-based system and interpreted independently by 13 experts of retinopathy of prematurity using a 3-level (plus, preplus, neither) and 2-level (plus, not plus) classification. Absolute agreement and kappa statistics were calculated to compare interexpert reliability.
RESULTS: In the 3-level classification, ≥ 70% experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 8 of the 15 wide-angle images (53%), but only in 3 of the 15 medium-angle (20%) and 3 of the 15 narrow-angle (20%) images. In the 2-level classification, ≥ 80% experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 11 of the 15 wide-angle images (73%), but only in 9 of the 15 medium-angle (60%) and 3 of the 15 narrow-angle (20%) images. Mean kappa of each expert compared with all other experts was 0.40 to 0.59 in 8 of 13 experts (62%) using wide-angle images, was 0 to 0.19 in 7 of 13 experts (54%) using medium-angle images, and was 0.20 to 0.39 in 9 of 13 experts (69%) using narrow-angle images.
CONCLUSION: Interexpert agreement in plus disease diagnosis in wide-angle images is higher than from medium-angle and narrow-angle images. Plus disease is defined using a narrow-angle standard published photograph, yet this study suggests that peripheral findings also contribute to diagnosis.
METHODS: Fifteen wide-angle images from infants with retinopathy of prematurity were cropped and adjusted in magnification to create 2 additional image categories: medium angle (40°-50°) and narrow angle (20°-30°). These 45 images were uploaded to a Web-based system and interpreted independently by 13 experts of retinopathy of prematurity using a 3-level (plus, preplus, neither) and 2-level (plus, not plus) classification. Absolute agreement and kappa statistics were calculated to compare interexpert reliability.
RESULTS: In the 3-level classification, ≥ 70% experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 8 of the 15 wide-angle images (53%), but only in 3 of the 15 medium-angle (20%) and 3 of the 15 narrow-angle (20%) images. In the 2-level classification, ≥ 80% experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 11 of the 15 wide-angle images (73%), but only in 9 of the 15 medium-angle (60%) and 3 of the 15 narrow-angle (20%) images. Mean kappa of each expert compared with all other experts was 0.40 to 0.59 in 8 of 13 experts (62%) using wide-angle images, was 0 to 0.19 in 7 of 13 experts (54%) using medium-angle images, and was 0.20 to 0.39 in 9 of 13 experts (69%) using narrow-angle images.
CONCLUSION: Interexpert agreement in plus disease diagnosis in wide-angle images is higher than from medium-angle and narrow-angle images. Plus disease is defined using a narrow-angle standard published photograph, yet this study suggests that peripheral findings also contribute to diagnosis.