Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders · 2015
Impact of Imaging and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers on Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Diagnosis within a Late-Onset Frontal Lobe Syndrome Cohort.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krudop Welmoed A, Dols Annemiek, Kerssens Cora J, Prins Niels D, Möller Christiane, Schouws Sigfried, Barkhof Frederik, van Berckel Bart N M, Teunissen Charlotte E, van der Flier Wiesje M, Scheltens Philip, Sikkes Sietske A M, Stek Max L, Pijnenburg Yolande A L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) incorporate MRI and [18F]-FDG-PET. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is merely advised for excluding Alzheimer's disease.
AIMS: We aimed to assess the impact of biomarkers on diagnostic certainty and contingent changes of bvFTD diagnosis within the clinically relevant neuropsychiatric differential diagnosis of subjects with a late-onset frontal lobe syndrome (LOF).
METHODS: We included 137 patients with LOF, aged 45-75 years, 72% males. Biomarker disclosure was considered contributing after any substantial difference in diagnostic certainty or a diagnostic change. Percentages of contributing biomarkers were compared between three major diagnostic groups (bvFTD, psychiatry, other neurological disorders). Certainty levels in stable diagnostic groups were compared to those with a diagnostic change.
RESULTS: Biomarkers contributed in 53, 60 and 41% of the LOF patients for MRI, [18F]-FDG-PET and CSF, respectively. Biomarkers changed the diagnosis in 14% of cases towards bvFTD and in 13% from bvFTD into an alternative. Those that changed had a lower level of a priori diagnostic certainty compared to stable diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: Our study not only supports the widely accepted use of MRI and [18F]-FDG-PET in diagnosing or excluding bvFTD, but also shows that CSF biomarkers aid clinicians in the diagnostic process.
AIMS: We aimed to assess the impact of biomarkers on diagnostic certainty and contingent changes of bvFTD diagnosis within the clinically relevant neuropsychiatric differential diagnosis of subjects with a late-onset frontal lobe syndrome (LOF).
METHODS: We included 137 patients with LOF, aged 45-75 years, 72% males. Biomarker disclosure was considered contributing after any substantial difference in diagnostic certainty or a diagnostic change. Percentages of contributing biomarkers were compared between three major diagnostic groups (bvFTD, psychiatry, other neurological disorders). Certainty levels in stable diagnostic groups were compared to those with a diagnostic change.
RESULTS: Biomarkers contributed in 53, 60 and 41% of the LOF patients for MRI, [18F]-FDG-PET and CSF, respectively. Biomarkers changed the diagnosis in 14% of cases towards bvFTD and in 13% from bvFTD into an alternative. Those that changed had a lower level of a priori diagnostic certainty compared to stable diagnoses.
CONCLUSION: Our study not only supports the widely accepted use of MRI and [18F]-FDG-PET in diagnosing or excluding bvFTD, but also shows that CSF biomarkers aid clinicians in the diagnostic process.