Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Capsule Endoscopy: Current Trends, Technological Advancements, and Future Perspectives in Gastrointestinal Diagnostics.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Su Chang-Chao, Chou Chu-Kuang, Mukundan Arvind, Karmakar Riya, Sanbatcha Binusha Fathima, Huang Chien-Wei, Weng Wei-Chun, Wang Hsiang-Chen
Аннотация
Capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostics by providing a non-invasive, patient-centered approach to observing the digestive tract. Conceived in 2000 by Gavriel Iddan, CE employs a diminutive, ingestible capsule containing a high-resolution camera, LED lighting, and a power supply. It specializes in visualizing the small intestine, a region frequently unreachable by conventional endoscopy. CE helps detect and monitor disorders, such as unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease, and cancer, while presenting a lower procedural risk than conventional endoscopy. Contrary to conventional techniques that necessitate anesthesia, CE reduces patient discomfort and complications. Nonetheless, its constraints, specifically the incapacity to conduct biopsies or therapeutic procedures, have spurred technical advancements. Five primary types of capsule endoscopes have emerged: steerable, magnetic, robotic, tethered, and hybrid. Their performance varies substantially. For example, the image sizes vary from 256 × 256 to 640 × 480 pixels, the fields of view (FOV) range from 140° to 360°, the battery life is between 8 and 15 h, and the frame rates fluctuate from 2 to 35 frames per second, contingent upon motion-adaptive capture. This study addresses a significant gap by methodically evaluating CE platforms, outlining their clinical preparedness, and examining the underexploited potential of artificial intelligence in improving diagnostic precision. Through the examination of technical requirements and clinical integration, we highlight the progress made in overcoming existing CE constraints and outline prospective developments for next-generation GI diagnostics.