International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
Predicting End-of-Treatment Ventilation Response to Radiation Therapy Using Early Treatment Ventilation for Patients With Lung Cancer Treated With Photons and Protons.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lim Rebecca, O'Connor Caleb S, Pan Joshua, Tang Tien T, Castelo Austin, He Yulun, Titt Uwe, Long James P, Altaie Mais, Mohan Radhe, Liao Zhongxing, Brock Kristy K
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Functional lung avoidance radiation therapy (RT) spares high-functioning regions of the lung to reduce toxicity risk but disregards functional changes during treatment. To further investigate functional changes in the normal lung, we employ voxel-based techniques, including ventilation maps, throughout treatment. We hypothesize that ventilation change during the beginning of treatment (BOT) predicts ventilation change between planning and the end of treatment (EOT).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 71 patients with lung cancer, 48 treated with photon RT and 23 treated with proton RT, 4-dimensional CT-based ventilation maps were generated using stress-based finite-element methods at planning, BOT, and EOT. Voxelwise ventilation change at BOT and EOT was calculated. Patients were stratified into 6 groups according to modality (combined and separate) and increased or decreased ventilation at BOT. For each group, ventilation change was binned by planned dose, and the median was computed at BOT and EOT across patients. EOT ventilation was correlated with planning ventilation, BOT ventilation, and clinical factors through univariate analysis. A linear regression model was developed to identify predictors of EOT ventilation. Model features included ventilation at planning, ventilation at BOT, and lung volume. Model accuracy was assessed through R2.
RESULTS: Of the patients with increased ventilation at BOT, 74% (79% of photon patients and 75% of proton patients) were stratified identically at EOT. Of the patients with decreased ventilation at BOT, 85% (86% of photon patients and 82% of proton patients) were stratified identically at EOT. Univariate analysis indicated that only planning ventilation, BOT ventilation, and lung volume were correlated with EOT ventilation. The linear regression model achieved an R2 of 0.89.
CONCLUSION: Ventilation change at BOT can predict ventilation change at EOT, demonstrating great potential for using ventilation as an imaging biomarker. Further work is needed to correlate ventilation change with patient-reported outcomes and radiation-induced toxicities such as pneumonitis.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 71 patients with lung cancer, 48 treated with photon RT and 23 treated with proton RT, 4-dimensional CT-based ventilation maps were generated using stress-based finite-element methods at planning, BOT, and EOT. Voxelwise ventilation change at BOT and EOT was calculated. Patients were stratified into 6 groups according to modality (combined and separate) and increased or decreased ventilation at BOT. For each group, ventilation change was binned by planned dose, and the median was computed at BOT and EOT across patients. EOT ventilation was correlated with planning ventilation, BOT ventilation, and clinical factors through univariate analysis. A linear regression model was developed to identify predictors of EOT ventilation. Model features included ventilation at planning, ventilation at BOT, and lung volume. Model accuracy was assessed through R2.
RESULTS: Of the patients with increased ventilation at BOT, 74% (79% of photon patients and 75% of proton patients) were stratified identically at EOT. Of the patients with decreased ventilation at BOT, 85% (86% of photon patients and 82% of proton patients) were stratified identically at EOT. Univariate analysis indicated that only planning ventilation, BOT ventilation, and lung volume were correlated with EOT ventilation. The linear regression model achieved an R2 of 0.89.
CONCLUSION: Ventilation change at BOT can predict ventilation change at EOT, demonstrating great potential for using ventilation as an imaging biomarker. Further work is needed to correlate ventilation change with patient-reported outcomes and radiation-induced toxicities such as pneumonitis.