World neurosurgery · 2018
Re-Exploration of Microvascular Decompression in Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia and Intraoperative Management Options.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hussain Mohammed Akbar, Konteas Anastasios, Sunderland Geraint, Franceschini Paulo, Byrne Patricia, Osman-Farah Jibril, Eldridge Paul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) is a debilitating disorder, and in patients for whom medical management is not sufficient, there are several therapeutic options. Microvascular decompression (MVD) for TGN has been shown to be highly effective; however, pain does recur after MVD in some patients. Therapeutic options for recurrent TGN are the same as those for primary TGN, including re-exploration of MVD (re-MVD). In this study we review our practice of re-MVD, comparing it with alternative options and assessing its safety and efficacy.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing re-MVD between 2007 and 2016.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent re-MVD, all with a Barrow Neurosurgical Institute Pain Index (BNPI) of IV or V. Postoperatively, 87% of patients reported an improvement in their BNPI to III or better, with 50% being BNPI 1 or 2. Eleven patients without distortion or vascular conflict at the time of re-exploration underwent intraoperative neurolysis, and 90% reported improvement in their BNPI. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a median pain-free period of 36 months after re-MVD. There were no significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-MVD is a safe and effective method of treating recurrent TGN. Intraoperative neurolysis is an important tool in re-exploration and should be considered when there is no ongoing compression or distortion of the trigeminal nerve.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing re-MVD between 2007 and 2016.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent re-MVD, all with a Barrow Neurosurgical Institute Pain Index (BNPI) of IV or V. Postoperatively, 87% of patients reported an improvement in their BNPI to III or better, with 50% being BNPI 1 or 2. Eleven patients without distortion or vascular conflict at the time of re-exploration underwent intraoperative neurolysis, and 90% reported improvement in their BNPI. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a median pain-free period of 36 months after re-MVD. There were no significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Re-MVD is a safe and effective method of treating recurrent TGN. Intraoperative neurolysis is an important tool in re-exploration and should be considered when there is no ongoing compression or distortion of the trigeminal nerve.