MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101596

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2020

Pondering on how great I am: Does rumination play a role in grandiose ideas?

Bortolon Catherine, Raffard Stéphane

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND &

OBJECTIVES

A recent psychological model proposed that rumination might be involved in grandiose delusions (GD) by amplifying positive mood triggered by the occurrence of a positive event or the recall of positive autobiographical memories. This is the first study whose aim is to explore the role of rumination in the development and maintenance of grandiose ideas in a nonclinical sample.

METHODS

Following a grandiose ideas induction task, 109 nonclinical participants completed a rumination and distraction condition. Participants also completed a questionnaire designed to measure GD.

RESULTS

Rumination induction was associated with maintained levels of grandiose ideas and positive affect, while distraction led to reduced levels of grandiose ideas. Our findings showed that grandiose ideas after the rumination condition, but not after the distraction condition, was associated with trait grandiosity.

LIMITATIONS: This study needs to be replicated in clinical samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ruminative thinking style might play a role in the maintenance of grandiose ideas. Consequently, interventions targeting rumination might be useful when targeting grandiose delusions in clinical samples.

Для цитирования: Bortolon Catherine, Raffard Stéphane. Pondering on how great I am: Does rumination play a role in grandiose ideas?. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101596.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.