Gynecologic oncology · 2015
A comparison of the toxicity and tolerability of two intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bouchard-Fortier Geneviève, Rosen Barry, Vyarvelska Iryna, Pasetka Mark, Covens Allan, Gien Lilian T, Kupets Rachel, Pulman Katherine, Ferguson Sarah E, Vicus Danielle
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients have demonstrated an impressive survival benefit of intraperitoneal (IP) platinum over intravenous (IV), but its use has been limited by significant toxicity from cisplatin. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and tolerability of IP cisplatin to IP carboplatin in women with optimally cytoreduced EOC.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 141 women with EOC who underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction followed by IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin or IP carboplatin was performed. Toxicities of the two treatment regimens were compared. As a secondary outcome, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) probabilities were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves.
RESULTS: Of the 141 patients, 77 (54.6%) received IP cisplatin and 64 (45.4%) received IP carboplatin. Eighty-six percent received at least 4 cycles of IP chemotherapy. IP cisplatin was associated with significantly more grade 3 nausea and vomiting (10.4% vs. 1.6%, p=0.033), grade 3 neuropathy (7.8% vs. 0%, p=0.013) and grade 2-3 neutropenia (22.1% vs. 9.4%, p=0.042). No difference in PFS (p=0.602) or OS (p=0.107) was found between the groups.
CONCLUSION: IP chemotherapy had a high completion rate in both groups of patients. IP carboplatin required a less resource intense protocol and was tolerated better than IP cisplatin with less gastrointestinal, neurologic and hematologic toxicities.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 141 women with EOC who underwent optimal surgical cytoreduction followed by IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin or IP carboplatin was performed. Toxicities of the two treatment regimens were compared. As a secondary outcome, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) probabilities were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves.
RESULTS: Of the 141 patients, 77 (54.6%) received IP cisplatin and 64 (45.4%) received IP carboplatin. Eighty-six percent received at least 4 cycles of IP chemotherapy. IP cisplatin was associated with significantly more grade 3 nausea and vomiting (10.4% vs. 1.6%, p=0.033), grade 3 neuropathy (7.8% vs. 0%, p=0.013) and grade 2-3 neutropenia (22.1% vs. 9.4%, p=0.042). No difference in PFS (p=0.602) or OS (p=0.107) was found between the groups.
CONCLUSION: IP chemotherapy had a high completion rate in both groups of patients. IP carboplatin required a less resource intense protocol and was tolerated better than IP cisplatin with less gastrointestinal, neurologic and hematologic toxicities.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, ParenteralMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult