Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet · 2014
Comparison of visual outcomes for aspheric and spherical toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism: a randomized control trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naripthaphan Pichit, Pachimkul Pongsak, Chantra Sompom
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With spherical intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, unaided vision of cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism is unsatisfactory because astigmatic spectacles will always be needed for clear vision. Toric IOL has been proven to be a major improvement in cataract surgery for spectacle independence. Aspheric property, reported to improve visual quality in a non-toric IOL, has now been added to toric IOL for even better unaided vision.
OBJECTIVE: To compare visual and aberrometric outcomes of 2 toric IOL, spherical and aspheric, at 3 months after implantation.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Cataract surgery was performed in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism using 2 types of toric IOLs, a spherical toric IOL, Acrys of SN60T (Group A) and a aspheric toric IOL, Acrts of SN6AT, (Group B) as a randomized control trial. The uncorrected distance (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, residual astigmatism, spherical equivalent (SE) and spherical aberration were evaluated 3 months after implantation.
RESULTS: The present study included 44 eyes. No statistically significant difference was found in UDVA, CDVA and residual astigmatism between both groups. The UDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better was found in 78.26% in Group A and 85.71% in Group B. In Group A, 78.26% of eyes and in Group B, 76.19% had a refractive astigmatism value within 0.50 diopter at KP90 (polar value along the 90-degree meridian). The spherical equivalent (SE) was within ±0.5 diopter of emmetropia in 91.30% in Group A and in 80.95% in Group B. Group B had significantly lower spherical aberration Z (4, 0) than Group A.
CONCLUSION: Both groups had similar clinical effectiveness for unaided visual acuity, aided visual acuity and astigmatism correction. Group B had significantly less spherical aberration induction when compared with Group A.
OBJECTIVE: To compare visual and aberrometric outcomes of 2 toric IOL, spherical and aspheric, at 3 months after implantation.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Cataract surgery was performed in cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism using 2 types of toric IOLs, a spherical toric IOL, Acrys of SN60T (Group A) and a aspheric toric IOL, Acrts of SN6AT, (Group B) as a randomized control trial. The uncorrected distance (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, residual astigmatism, spherical equivalent (SE) and spherical aberration were evaluated 3 months after implantation.
RESULTS: The present study included 44 eyes. No statistically significant difference was found in UDVA, CDVA and residual astigmatism between both groups. The UDVA of 0.1 logMAR or better was found in 78.26% in Group A and 85.71% in Group B. In Group A, 78.26% of eyes and in Group B, 76.19% had a refractive astigmatism value within 0.50 diopter at KP90 (polar value along the 90-degree meridian). The spherical equivalent (SE) was within ±0.5 diopter of emmetropia in 91.30% in Group A and in 80.95% in Group B. Group B had significantly lower spherical aberration Z (4, 0) than Group A.
CONCLUSION: Both groups had similar clinical effectiveness for unaided visual acuity, aided visual acuity and astigmatism correction. Group B had significantly less spherical aberration induction when compared with Group A.