Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2014
Therapeutic flap amputation for atypical LASIK flap and interface abnormalities.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weissman Heather M, Randleman J Bradley
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe LASIK flap amputation as a therapeutic option for patients with atypical refractory flap complications.
METHODS: Case series and literature review.
RESULTS: Seven eyes of 6 patients underwent flap amputation for various atypical indications, including non-infectious flap/interface opacity (3 patients), irregular astigmatism on the flap surface (3 patients), and chronic pain (concurrent in 2 patients with irregular astigmatism). In each case, conservative measures were ineffective. All patients had symptomatic improvement and improved corrected visual function after amputation; however, uncorrected distance visual acuity worsened in 2 patients, manifest refraction worsened in 3 patients, and irregular astigmatism increased in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Flap amputation is a reasonable alternative to improve corrected acuity in select cases with significant flap opacities or irregular astigmatism unresponsive to conservative measures, but uncorrected acuity and irregular astigmatism may worsen and should be discussed during the informed consent process.
METHODS: Case series and literature review.
RESULTS: Seven eyes of 6 patients underwent flap amputation for various atypical indications, including non-infectious flap/interface opacity (3 patients), irregular astigmatism on the flap surface (3 patients), and chronic pain (concurrent in 2 patients with irregular astigmatism). In each case, conservative measures were ineffective. All patients had symptomatic improvement and improved corrected visual function after amputation; however, uncorrected distance visual acuity worsened in 2 patients, manifest refraction worsened in 3 patients, and irregular astigmatism increased in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Flap amputation is a reasonable alternative to improve corrected acuity in select cases with significant flap opacities or irregular astigmatism unresponsive to conservative measures, but uncorrected acuity and irregular astigmatism may worsen and should be discussed during the informed consent process.