Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2014
Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism and higher-order aberrations.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nagy Zoltán Z, Dunai Arpád, Kránitz Kinga, Takács Agnes Ildikó, Sándor Gábor László, Hécz Réka, Knorz Michael C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs).
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, conventional phacoemulsification with a 2.8-mm clear corneal incision using a disposable keratome was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (manual group), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with a 2.8-mm biplanar clear corneal tunnel created by a femtosecond laser (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (femtosecond laser group). Corneal topography readings and corneal wavefront aberrations (diameter: 9.0 mm) were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgerate, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SIA between the groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.47 ± 0.13 vs manual group: 0.41 ± 0.14; P = .218), but the axis deviation of the SIA axis from the previously planned axis was significantly smaller in the femtosecond laser group compared to the manual group (4.47°± 2.59° vs 7.38°± 4.72°, respectively; P = .048). Corneal HOAs increased significantly in both groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.13 ± 0.09 to 0.18 ± 0.12, P = .025; manual group: 0.13 ± 0.05 to 0.15 ± 0.05, P = .002), but preoperative and postoperative values did not differ significantly between them (P = .472 and .078, respectively). Lower-order and total corneal aberration values remained stable in both groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in SIA and induced HOAs between manual and femtosecond laser-created clear corneal incisions.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, conventional phacoemulsification with a 2.8-mm clear corneal incision using a disposable keratome was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (manual group), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with a 2.8-mm biplanar clear corneal tunnel created by a femtosecond laser (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (femtosecond laser group). Corneal topography readings and corneal wavefront aberrations (diameter: 9.0 mm) were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgerate, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SIA between the groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.47 ± 0.13 vs manual group: 0.41 ± 0.14; P = .218), but the axis deviation of the SIA axis from the previously planned axis was significantly smaller in the femtosecond laser group compared to the manual group (4.47°± 2.59° vs 7.38°± 4.72°, respectively; P = .048). Corneal HOAs increased significantly in both groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.13 ± 0.09 to 0.18 ± 0.12, P = .025; manual group: 0.13 ± 0.05 to 0.15 ± 0.05, P = .002), but preoperative and postoperative values did not differ significantly between them (P = .472 and .078, respectively). Lower-order and total corneal aberration values remained stable in both groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in SIA and induced HOAs between manual and femtosecond laser-created clear corneal incisions.