Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
Naturalistic Driving Outcomes and Sensorimotor Function in Cognitively Normal Older Adults.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bekena Semere, Singh Ramkrishna K, Zhu Yiqi, Harrison Kimystian, Williams Jonathan P, Laurido-Soto Osvaldo J, Al-Hammadi Noor, Dickerson Anne, Carr David B, Babulal Ganesh M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Driving supports independence and quality of life in later life but is vulnerable to age-related and/or disease-related decline. While cognitive impairment is a well-recognized risk for unsafe mobility, the contribution of sensorimotor function is less understood.
METHODS: We studied 374 cognitively normal older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 at baseline) enrolled in the DRIVES Project. A SensoryMotor Impairment Index (SMI) was constructed from six domains (grip strength, gait speed, reaction time, hearing, vision, olfaction) and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 impairments. Naturalistic driving was continuously monitored using in-vehicle GPS dataloggers between 2019 and 2025. Linear mixed-effects models tested whether longitudinal driving trajectories differed by baseline SMI, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite).
RESULTS: At baseline, participants with higher SMI burden were older and had lower cognitive scores (both p < 0.01). Over time, greater sensorymotor impairment was associated with faster declines in driving exposure and spatial range. Compared with SMI = 0, participants with SMI ≥ 3 showed steeper reductions in nighttime trips (-0.050 vs. -0.037 trips/month), long-distance trips (> 20 miles; p < 0.001), and maximum trip distance (p = 0.009), and greater contraction of driving space (entropy and radius of gyration; p < 0.001). Self-reported driving behaviors showed that participants with higher SMI drove fewer days per-week and were more likely to avoid night driving (p < 0.01). Rates of self-reported adverse driving events (e.g., crashes or citations) did not differ significantly across SMI groups, consistent with compensatory self-regulatory behaviors.
CONCLUSION: Greater sensorymotor impairment predicts accelerated decline in naturalistic driving among cognitively normal older adults, independent of cognition. A composite SMI may provide a feasible, low-cost approach to identify older drivers at risk for declining mobility and support timely interventions to prolong safe driving.
METHODS: We studied 374 cognitively normal older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 at baseline) enrolled in the DRIVES Project. A SensoryMotor Impairment Index (SMI) was constructed from six domains (grip strength, gait speed, reaction time, hearing, vision, olfaction) and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 impairments. Naturalistic driving was continuously monitored using in-vehicle GPS dataloggers between 2019 and 2025. Linear mixed-effects models tested whether longitudinal driving trajectories differed by baseline SMI, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite).
RESULTS: At baseline, participants with higher SMI burden were older and had lower cognitive scores (both p < 0.01). Over time, greater sensorymotor impairment was associated with faster declines in driving exposure and spatial range. Compared with SMI = 0, participants with SMI ≥ 3 showed steeper reductions in nighttime trips (-0.050 vs. -0.037 trips/month), long-distance trips (> 20 miles; p < 0.001), and maximum trip distance (p = 0.009), and greater contraction of driving space (entropy and radius of gyration; p < 0.001). Self-reported driving behaviors showed that participants with higher SMI drove fewer days per-week and were more likely to avoid night driving (p < 0.01). Rates of self-reported adverse driving events (e.g., crashes or citations) did not differ significantly across SMI groups, consistent with compensatory self-regulatory behaviors.
CONCLUSION: Greater sensorymotor impairment predicts accelerated decline in naturalistic driving among cognitively normal older adults, independent of cognition. A composite SMI may provide a feasible, low-cost approach to identify older drivers at risk for declining mobility and support timely interventions to prolong safe driving.