MedElevator
Войти в исследования Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL · 2025
Palatal height, thickness and density according to facial biotype in Peruvian adults: a tomographic study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rodríguez-Rimachi María E Rodríguez-Rimachi, Tisnado-Florián Carlos I Tisnado-Florián, Dulanto-Vargas Julissa A, Carranza-Samanez Kilder M
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Micro-screw stability requires adequate bone quantity and quality. Micro-screws are often placed inthe hard palate, in which anatomy may vary according to vertical growth.
AIM: To compare the height,width and density of the palate according to facial biotype using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHOD: Observational cross-sectional study on a sample of 39 CBCT scansof adults aged 18 to 50 years (19 females and 20 males) assigned to facial biotypes according to SNGoGn. The height (mm), cortical width (mm) and density in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured at 20coordinates on the left side of the palate coordinates corresponding to the combinations of four pointsmedial to the suture (3, 5, 7 and 9 mm) and five points posterior to the incisive foramen (3, 6, 9, 12 and15 mm). ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of p< 0.05.
RESULTS: Values were: hypodivergent (height: 2.16 - 6.32 mm; width: 1.61 - 2.02 mm; density:1117.28 - 1182.83 HU), normodivergent (height: 2.71 - 9.21 mm; width: 1.67 - 2.08 mm; density:1106.53 - 1177.86 HU) and hyperdivergent (height: 2.37 - 12.32 mm; width: 1.62 - 2.07 mm; density:1088.2 - 1156.7 HU). Compared to hyperdivergent subjects, in hypodivergent individuals 60% of themeasurement points had lower heights and 15% of measurement points showed thinner, denser cortices,with significant differences (p <0.05).
CONCLUSION: Facial biotypes were found to be associated withpalate bone characteristics, with greater cortical heights and widths in hyperdivergent subjects andgreater densities in hypodivergent subjects.
AIM: To compare the height,width and density of the palate according to facial biotype using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHOD: Observational cross-sectional study on a sample of 39 CBCT scansof adults aged 18 to 50 years (19 females and 20 males) assigned to facial biotypes according to SNGoGn. The height (mm), cortical width (mm) and density in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured at 20coordinates on the left side of the palate coordinates corresponding to the combinations of four pointsmedial to the suture (3, 5, 7 and 9 mm) and five points posterior to the incisive foramen (3, 6, 9, 12 and15 mm). ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of p< 0.05.
RESULTS: Values were: hypodivergent (height: 2.16 - 6.32 mm; width: 1.61 - 2.02 mm; density:1117.28 - 1182.83 HU), normodivergent (height: 2.71 - 9.21 mm; width: 1.67 - 2.08 mm; density:1106.53 - 1177.86 HU) and hyperdivergent (height: 2.37 - 12.32 mm; width: 1.62 - 2.07 mm; density:1088.2 - 1156.7 HU). Compared to hyperdivergent subjects, in hypodivergent individuals 60% of themeasurement points had lower heights and 15% of measurement points showed thinner, denser cortices,with significant differences (p <0.05).
CONCLUSION: Facial biotypes were found to be associated withpalate bone characteristics, with greater cortical heights and widths in hyperdivergent subjects andgreater densities in hypodivergent subjects.