MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gaceta medica de Mexico · 2006

[Risk factors associated with neurocysticercosis in a public hospital in Mexico].

Ortiz-Trejo Juan Manuel, Correa-Chacón Arnulfo Joel, Sctelo-Ham Elma Ivonne, Torres-Valenzuela Alejandro, Alvarado-Esquivel Cosme

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A case-control study was carried out to determine risk factors associated with neurocysticercosis in a public hospital in Mexico.

METHODS

The following factors were analyzed: Socioeconomic, sociodemographic, hygiene, eating habits, and family history of neurocysticercosis in 85 cases and 170 controls. Cases were patients with cranial computed tomography images compatible with neurocysticercosis. The densitometric analysis (Hounsfield units) allowed us to distinguish normal tissue from physiological and pathological calcifications, and other types of lesions. Controls were admitted for neurocysticercosis but findings were not compatible with initial diagnosis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS and Epi-info 2002.

RESULTS

The most common clinical manifestation in patients was epileptic seizures OR=4.2 (IC 95% 2.40-9.67). With regards to risk factors, consumption of street food OR=2.33 (IC 95% 1.25-4.38), and family history of neurocysticercosis OR= 2.37 (IC 95% 1.11-5.04) were found to be associated with neurocysticercosis. In the north central region of Mexico where this study was performed, the disease was more frequent among urban populations.

Для цитирования: Ortiz-Trejo Juan Manuel, Correa-Chacón Arnulfo Joel, Sctelo-Ham Elma Ivonne, Torres-Valenzuela Alejandro, Alvarado-Esquivel Cosme. [Risk factors associated with neurocysticercosis in a public hospital in Mexico].. Gaceta medica de Mexico. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.