The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2006
Differential allergen sensitization patterns in chestnut allergy with or without associated latex-fruit syndrome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sánchez-Monge Rosa, Blanco Carlos, López-Torrejón Gema, Cumplido Jose, Recas Munia, Figueroa Javier, Carrillo Teresa, Salcedo Gabriel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Chestnut allergy has been almost exclusively considered in the context of the latex-fruit syndrome. Chestnut allergens not linked to latex hypersensitivity have not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore whether differences in sensitization patterns between chestnut allergy with or without associated latex-fruit syndrome can be detected.
METHODS: Twelve patients sensitized to chestnut but not to latex and 3 control patients with latex-chestnut allergy were analyzed. A major chestnut allergen was purified and characterized. IgE immunoblotting, specific IgE determination, and skin prick tests with 5 isolated allergens involved in food allergy or latex-fruit syndrome were also performed.
RESULTS: A major 9-kd allergen was detected in chestnut extract, isolated, and identified as lipid transfer protein (LTP) Cas s 8. Specific IgE to this allergen was found in 91% (by means of IgE immunoblotting) and 58% (by means of ELISA) of sera from patients with chestnut but not latex allergy. Moreover, 66% of these patients had positive skin prick test responses to Cas s 8. Additionally, allergenic LTPs from peach fruit and Artemisia vulgaris pollen were also reactive. In contrast, avocado class I chitinase and latex hevein, allergens associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, showed no reaction. The opposite situation was exhibited by patients with latex-chestnut allergy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chestnut allergy with or without associated latex hypersensitivity present different patterns of major allergens (LTPs and class I chitinases, respectively).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: LTPs and class I chitinases can be used as diagnostic tools in patients with chestnut allergy to predict whether an associated latex sensitization and a risk of potential cross-reactivity with other plant foods and pollens exist.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore whether differences in sensitization patterns between chestnut allergy with or without associated latex-fruit syndrome can be detected.
METHODS: Twelve patients sensitized to chestnut but not to latex and 3 control patients with latex-chestnut allergy were analyzed. A major chestnut allergen was purified and characterized. IgE immunoblotting, specific IgE determination, and skin prick tests with 5 isolated allergens involved in food allergy or latex-fruit syndrome were also performed.
RESULTS: A major 9-kd allergen was detected in chestnut extract, isolated, and identified as lipid transfer protein (LTP) Cas s 8. Specific IgE to this allergen was found in 91% (by means of IgE immunoblotting) and 58% (by means of ELISA) of sera from patients with chestnut but not latex allergy. Moreover, 66% of these patients had positive skin prick test responses to Cas s 8. Additionally, allergenic LTPs from peach fruit and Artemisia vulgaris pollen were also reactive. In contrast, avocado class I chitinase and latex hevein, allergens associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, showed no reaction. The opposite situation was exhibited by patients with latex-chestnut allergy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chestnut allergy with or without associated latex hypersensitivity present different patterns of major allergens (LTPs and class I chitinases, respectively).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: LTPs and class I chitinases can be used as diagnostic tools in patients with chestnut allergy to predict whether an associated latex sensitization and a risk of potential cross-reactivity with other plant foods and pollens exist.