MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.52389

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

A Case of Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Followed Up for 15 Years.

Takizawa Daichi, Okumura Toshiyuki, Mizumoto Masashi, Nakai Kei, Sakurai Hideyuki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas are rare and benign tumors but often have a progressive course and are complicated by retinal detachment and glaucoma. The effectiveness of external radiation for large tumors that are difficult to treat with photodynamic therapy was recently reported; however, few studies have conducted long-term follow-ups. We encountered a case of localized choroidal hemangioma that was treated with proton beam therapy and followed up for 15 years. A 37-year-old man was diagnosed with a 10 × 4 mm circumscribed choroidal hemangioma involving the macular area with retinal detachment. Proton beam therapy was performed at 26.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 8 fractions. The choroidal hemangioma gradually shrank over three years, and the retinal detachment also improved. A cataract developed on the affected side 11 years after irradiation, and eye coordination issues developed 15 years after irradiation. Glaucoma was not observed during the follow-up period; however, visual acuity did not recover, and the patient developed light perception. Although vision was not preserved, proton beam therapy effectively shrank the tumor and maintained quality of life.

Для цитирования: Takizawa Daichi, Okumura Toshiyuki, Mizumoto Masashi, Nakai Kei, Sakurai Hideyuki. A Case of Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy and Followed Up for 15 Years.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52389.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.