MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fnume.2026.1762984

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026

Rethinking dynamics: static amino acid PET parameters vs. dynamic amino acid PET parameters for the detection of tumor progression in patients with post-treatment glioma.

Henssen Dylan, Rullmann Michael, Schildan Andreas, Striepe Stephan, Schürer Matti, Scherlach Cordula, Jähne Katja, Stassart Ruth, Sabri Osama, Seidel Clemens, Hesse Swen

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether dynamic amino-acid (AA) positron-emission tomography (PET) has additional diagnostic value over static AA-PET to distinguish tumor progression (TP) from treatment-related abnormalities (TRA) in patients with post-treatment glioma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with glioma with suspected TP who underwent dynamic AA-PET imaging. The final diagnoses were based on histopathology and/or clinical-radiological follow-up. The static PET parameters included the mean and maximum tumor-to-brain ratio (TBRmax and TBRmean, respectively) and the dynamic PET parameters included time to peak (TTP) and area under the time activity curve (AUTAC). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

In total, 33 patients with adult diffuse glioma (17 females: mean age: 55.7 ± 12.2 years) were included [13 [S-methyl-11C]methionine ([11C]MET) and 20 O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (1⁸F]FET) PET examinations]. The static parameters (TBRmean and TBRmax) were significantly different between the TP and TRA groups when using [11C]MET (p = 0.019 and p = 0.013, respectively), resulting in very-good-to-excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUROC values of 0.85 and 0.93, respectively). The TBRmean values derived from [18F]FET PET data were not significantly different between the TP and TRA groups (p = 0.066). However, the [18F]FET PET data-derived TBRmax values were significantly higher in the individuals with TP (p = 0.005), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.84). The dynamic PET parameters (time to peak and area under the time activity curve) were not significantly different between the TP and TRA groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that dynamic and static AA-PET parameters have similar diagnostic capacities to distinguish TP from TRA. While static AA-PET parameters may suffice for clinical decision-making, this study did not formally assess the incremental value of using dynamic metrics in addition to static measures.

Для цитирования: Henssen Dylan, Rullmann Michael, Schildan Andreas, Striepe Stephan, Schürer Matti, Scherlach Cordula, Jähne Katja, Stassart Ruth, Sabri Osama, Seidel Clemens, Hesse Swen. Rethinking dynamics: static amino acid PET parameters vs. dynamic amino acid PET parameters for the detection of tumor progression in patients with post-treatment glioma.. Frontiers in nuclear medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2026.1762984.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.