Ophthalmic epidemiology · 2020
Tutorial on Biostatistics: Longitudinal Analysis of Correlated Continuous Eye Data.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ying Gui-Shuang, Maguire Maureen G, Glynn Robert J, Rosner Bernard
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe and demonstrate methods for analyzing longitudinal correlated eye data with a continuous outcome measure.
METHODS: We described fixed effects, mixed effects and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, applied them to data from the Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). In CAPT (N = 1052), we assessed the effect of eye-specific laser treatment on change in visual acuity (VA). In the AREDS study, we evaluated effects of systemic supplement treatment among 1463 participants with AMD category 3.
RESULTS: In CAPT, the inter-eye correlations (0.33 to 0.53) and longitudinal correlations (0.31 to 0.88) varied. There was a small treatment effect on VA change (approximately one letter) at 24 months for all three models (p = .009 to 0.02). Model fit was better with the mixed effects model than the fixed effects model (p < .001). In AREDS, there was no significant treatment effect in all models (p > .55). Current smokers had a significantly greater VA decline than non-current smokers in the fixed effects model (p = .04) and the mixed effects model with random intercept (p = .0003), but marginally significant in the mixed effects model with random intercept and slope (p = .08), and GEE models (p = .054 to 0.07). The model fit was better with the fixed effects model than the mixed effects model (p < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Longitudinal models using the eye as the unit of analysis can be implemented using available statistical software to account for both inter-eye and longitudinal correlations. Goodness-of-fit statistics may guide the selection of the most appropriate model.
METHODS: We described fixed effects, mixed effects and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, applied them to data from the Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). In CAPT (N = 1052), we assessed the effect of eye-specific laser treatment on change in visual acuity (VA). In the AREDS study, we evaluated effects of systemic supplement treatment among 1463 participants with AMD category 3.
RESULTS: In CAPT, the inter-eye correlations (0.33 to 0.53) and longitudinal correlations (0.31 to 0.88) varied. There was a small treatment effect on VA change (approximately one letter) at 24 months for all three models (p = .009 to 0.02). Model fit was better with the mixed effects model than the fixed effects model (p < .001). In AREDS, there was no significant treatment effect in all models (p > .55). Current smokers had a significantly greater VA decline than non-current smokers in the fixed effects model (p = .04) and the mixed effects model with random intercept (p = .0003), but marginally significant in the mixed effects model with random intercept and slope (p = .08), and GEE models (p = .054 to 0.07). The model fit was better with the fixed effects model than the mixed effects model (p < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Longitudinal models using the eye as the unit of analysis can be implemented using available statistical software to account for both inter-eye and longitudinal correlations. Goodness-of-fit statistics may guide the selection of the most appropriate model.