MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
International journal of cancer · 2025

Age and tumour presentations differ between HPV type 16 positive and other high-risk HPV type-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in a Swedish cohort of 2000-2022.

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Näsman Anders, Birgersson Madeleine, Näsman Tobias, Jörtsö Evelina, Zupancic Mark, Bark Rusana, Marklund Linda, Dalianis Tina

Аннотация

The incidence of human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) has increased the past decades. Initial reports disclosed that HPV type 16 (HPV16) was predominant and that patients with HPV+ OPSCC were generally younger and had a better prognosis than those with HPV negative (HPV-) OPSCC. However, recent reports suggest that age differences between patients with HPV+ and HPV-OPSCC are less pronounced and that other high-risk HPV types (HR-HPV) are becoming more common. Here, we therefore investigated whether there were age differences between patients with HPV16-positive and other HR-HPV type positive OPSCC. During 2000-2022, in the Stockholm-Gotland-Region, Sweden, 1681 patients with OPSCC tested for the presence of common mucosal HPV types were included. Among these, 1180 cases had a HR-HPV type infection, with 1032 identified as HPV16 and 148 as other HR-HPV types; one with a low-risk HPV type infection; and 500 classified as HPV-. Patients with HPV+ OPSCC were significantly younger than those with HPV- OPSCC (mean 63 vs. 66.5, p <.001). Among patients with HPV+ OPSCC, those diagnosed with HPV16 were significantly younger than those with other HR-HPV types (mean 61.1 vs. 64.5, p< 0.001). These age differences were present irrespective of sex, but patients with HPV16-positive OPSCC were significantly more likely to present with smaller tumours upon diagnosis (p = 0.002). Moreover, notably, statistically significant age differences between HPV16 and other HR-HPV types were mainly observed in the more recent years (2010-2022). To conclude, the increasing influence of HR-HPV types other than HPV16 in OPSCC warrants further investigation.

Предметные рубрики MeSH