MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1035076

Медицинская библиотека · Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 1997

[Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].

Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to test for correlation between relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) and visual acuity, central differential light threshold and visual field defect measured by suprasthreshold automated grid perimetry.

METHODS

In 98 patients with optic neuropathies of different origin (inflammatory, ischemic, or compressive) in addition to a standard ophthalmological examination, static perimetry of the 30 degrees visual field with a dense grid of test spots, including measurement of the central differential light sensitivity, was done by means of the Tübingen Automated Perimeter. RAPD was tested using the swinging flashlight test quantified with neutral density filters.

RESULTS

Visual acuity and central differential light sensitivity correlated only weakly with the RAPD. The visual field showed a better correlation (coeff. of corr. for all patients 0.58, for patients with optic neuritis 0.64. for patients with AION 0.53 and for patients with compressive neuropathies 0.84). One test spot not seen in perimetry corresponded to an RAPD of about 0.01 log-units.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm those from previous studies obtained by threshold perimetry. The RAPD is a good parameter for the severity of an optic nerve lesion, especially of compressive origin.

Для цитирования: Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde. 1997. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1035076.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.