DOI 10.1007/s11604-024-01707-z
The added value of including thyroid nodule features into large language models for automatic ACR TI-RADS classification based on ultrasound reports.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System (TI-RADS) uses a score based on ultrasound (US) imaging to stratify the risk of nodule malignancy and recommend appropriate follow-up. This study aims to analyze US reports and explore how Natural Language Processing (NLP) leveraging Transformers models can classify ACR TI-RADS from text reports using the description of thyroid nodule features.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This retrospective study evaluated 16,847 thyroid-free text reports from our institution. An automated system, followed by manual review by a radiologist, established baseline annotations by assigning ACR TI-RADS categories from 1 to 5. Two types of systems were evaluated and compared in the dataset. The first by performing a multiclass classification to detect the associated ACR TI-RADS, and the second by extracting thyroid nodule features from the textual reports and incorporating them into the classifier.
RESULTS
Our study showed that models enhanced with specific features systematically outperformed those without. Particularly, the BERTIN model, to which additional features were added, achieved the highest level of accuracy, with a score of 0.8426. Moreover, we found a correlation between the presence of punctate echogenic foci, a feature often linked to malignant thyroid lesions, and increased ACR TI-RADS scores.
CONCLUSIONS
The features of the thyroid nodules described in thyroid US reports, such as composition, echogenicity, shape, margin or echogenic foci, help the NLP classifier to predict the associated ACR TI-RADS most accurately.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.