DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.029
Patient subjective visual function after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess subjective visual function after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).
SETTING
Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice.
DESIGN
Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
METHODS
Patients completed a subjective questionnaire regarding visual symptoms administered preoperatively and 1 year after CXL. Patients ranked self-reported symptoms of photophobia, difficulty night driving, difficulty reading, diplopia, fluctuations in vision, glare, halo, starburst, dryness, pain, and foreign-body sensation on a scale from 1 to 5. Possible associations of symptoms with changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry were also analyzed.
RESULTS
One hundred seven eyes of 76 patients had CXL for keratoconus (n = 71) or ectasia (n = 36). The mean preoperative to 1-year postoperative changes in night driving (3.2 ± 1.5 [SD] to 2.8 ± 1.5), difficulty reading (3.1 ± 1.5 to 2.9 ± 1.3), diplopia (2.5 ± 1.3 to 2.1 ± 1.2), glare (3.1 ± 1.4 to 2.7 ± 1.2), halo (2.9 ± 1.4 to 2.5 ± 1.3), starbursts (2.6 ± 1.5 to 2.4 ± 1.4), and foreign-body sensation (1.8 ± 1.1 to 1.6 ± 0.9) were statistically significant. There were no associations between the change in any symptom and changes in CDVA. There was a weak association between the change in night driving, pain, and foreign-body sensations and the change in maximum keratometry.
CONCLUSIONS
After CXL, patients noted subjective improvement in visual symptoms, specifically night driving, difficulty reading, diplopia, glare, halo, starbursts, and foreign-body sensation. These subjective outcomes corroborate quantitative clinical improvements seen after CXL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.