DOI 10.1590/s0004-27492011000300008
[Refractive and topographic changes of ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty with a crescent-shape 0.5 mm resection of the inferior cornea in keratoconus after a 24 months follow-up].
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Ipsilateral rotational penetrating autokeratoplasty technique may be an alternative to minimize the problem of long waiting lists for transplantation due to keratoconus.
PURPOSE: To report the visual outcomes in keratoconus patients after ipsilateral rotational penetrating autokeratoplasty technique (IRPAK) associated with a crescent-shape resection of 0.5 mm of the inferior cornea.
METHODS
According to a prospective, longitudinal, interventional, analytic study, the authors investigated the visual results of 15 patients (18 eyes) with keratoconus, who underwent an ipsilateral rotational penetrating autokeratoplasty, by two coincident trepanations superiorly and with a difference of 0.5 mm inferiorly. After resection of this corneal crescent, a 180° rotation of the corneal disk was performed, which was fixed with 24 sutures diametrically opposed. The patients were followed-up for a period of 24 months.
RESULTS
Comparing data of the first and second postoperative years to preoperative data, there were: significant improvements in visual acuity, vision lines and spherical equivalent; reduction of topographic astigmatism and maximum and mean corneal curvatures. There was also a decrease in corneal thickness associated to a reduction of corneal endothelial cell count.
CONCLUSION
There was an improvement of ophthalmologic parameters 6, 12 and 24 months after ipsilateral rotational penetrating autokeratoplasty associated with a crescent-shape resection of 0.5 mm of the inferior cornea, but along the follow-up there was reduction of visual acuity with increased astigmatism.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.