DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02500.x
Corneal transplantation in Hungary (1946-2009).
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To identify changing trends in indications for corneal transplantation in Debrecen, Hungary over the past 64 years.
DESIGN
Retrospective study, at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Debrecen, Hungary.
PARTICIPANTS
Four thousand seven hundred and seventy-eight patients who underwent keratoplasty.
METHODS
The analysis was based on medical charts, surgical descriptions and eye bank records.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Keratoplasty indications between January 1946 and December 2009. For an easier overview, the 64-year interval was divided into seven time periods (1946-1955, I; 1956-1965, II; 1966-1975, III; 1976-1985, IV; 1986-1995, V; 1996-2005, VI; 2006-2009, VII).
RESULTS
Over the 64 years, clinical indications for keratoplasty were corneal scarring (24.9%), regraft (18.6%), keratoconus (18.6%), pseudophakic/aphakic corneal oedema (12%), stromal corneal dystrophies (6%), non-infectious keratitis (4.7%), chemical injuries (3.3%), corneal degenerations (3%), mechanical trauma (1.7%), infectious keratitis (1.4%), endothelial corneal dystrophies (1.3%) and others (4.5%). During periods I-IV, corneal scarring was the most common indication for corneal transplantation. In period V, corneal ectasia became the leading clinical indication. Regraft was the most frequent indication in period VI. In the most recent years, an emerging tendency in pseudophakic/aphakic corneal oedema as the indication for keratoplasty was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
In Hungary, the number of grafts has increased greatly in the past 64 years, the transplantation rates are similar to those of industrial countries. Indications for corneal transplantation have changed considerably over the last half decade from corneal scarring to corneal ectasia, regraft and pseudophakic/aphakic corneal oedema.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.