DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.029
Corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in patients with keratoconus and corneal ectasia and analyze associations of these changes with visual acuity.
SETTING
Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice.
DESIGN
Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
METHODS
Corneal collagen crosslinking was performed in eyes with keratoconus or ectasia. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography were measured with the Pentacam topographer and included 7 indices: index of surface variance, index of vertical asymmetry, keratoconus index, central keratoconus index, minimum radius of curvature, index of height asymmetry, and index of height decentration. Follow-up was 1 year.
RESULTS
The study comprised 71 eyes, 49 with keratoconus and 22 with post-LASIK ectasia. In the entire patient cohort, there were significant improvements in the index of surface variance, index of vertical asymmetry, keratoconus index, and minimum radius of curvature at 1 year compared with baseline (all P < .001). There were no significant differences between the keratoconus and ectasia subgroups. Improvements in postoperative indices were not correlated with changes in corrected or uncorrected distance visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONS
There were improvements in 4 of 7 topography indices 1 year after CXL, suggesting an overall improvement in corneal shape. However, no significant correlation was found between the changes in individual topography indices and changes in visual acuity after CXL.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.