MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology · 1990

[Abnormal cluster formation in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome with trisomy-11--periodical approach by colony assay].

Tanabe N, Hotta T, Murate T, Goto T, Inagaki J, Kimura K

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

59 year old female was admitted to Nagoya Memorial Hospital for anemia unknown etiology after the work up of the gastrointestinal tract. Peripheral blood count at admission was as follows: WBC 2,400/microliters, RBC 321 X 10(4)/microliters, Hb 9.8 g/dl, Ht 30.1%, Plt 8.2 X 10(4)/microliters, which showed pancytopenia with normocytic, normochromic anemia. She had no hepatosplenomegaly, vitamin B12 nor folate deficiency. Bone marrow was hyperplastic and showed trilineage megalodysplastic changes. The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (Refractory anemia) was made. Progenitor assay showed no colony formation of BFU-E but showed normal growth of CFU-GM colony and cluster. She had chromosomal abnormality of 47, XX, + 11. Administrated anabolic steroid, prednine and activated vitamin D3 were not effective and she died of brain hemorrhage in April 1987. Colony assay at this stage showed numerous leukemic clusters and no normal colonies. Re-performed chromosome assay showed 47, XX, + 11. There are only a few reports of trisomy-11 in a patient with MDS. Especially we could follow this case till her leukemic transformation by colony assay.

Для цитирования: Tanabe N, Hotta T, Murate T, Goto T, Inagaki J, Kimura K. [Abnormal cluster formation in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome with trisomy-11--periodical approach by colony assay].. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology. 1990.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.