MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s10194-016-0707-9

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of headache and pain · 2016

Headache service quality: evaluation of quality indicators in 14 specialist-care centres.

Schramm Sara, Uluduz Derya, Gouveia Raquel Gil, Jensen Rigmor, Siva Aksel, Uygunoglu Ugur, Gvantsa Giorgadze, Mania Maka, Braschinsky Mark, Filatova Elena, Latysheva Nina, Osipova Vera, Skorobogatykh Kirill, Azimova Julia, Straube Andreas, Eren Ozan Emre, Martelletti Paolo, De Angelis Valerio, Negro Andrea, Linde Mattias, Hagen Knut, Radojicic Aleksandra, Zidverc-Trajkovic Jasna, Podgorac Ana, Paemeleire Koen, De Pue Annelien, Lampl Christian, Steiner Timothy J, Katsarava Zaza

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The study was a collaboration between Lifting The Burden (LTB) and the European Headache Federation (EHF). Its aim was to evaluate the implementation of quality indicators for headache care Europe-wide in specialist headache centres (level-3 according to the EHF/LTB standard).

METHODS

Employing previously-developed instruments in 14 such centres, we made enquiries, in each, of health-care providers (doctors, nurses, psychologists, physiotherapists) and 50 patients, and analysed the medical records of 50 other patients. Enquiries were in 9 domains: diagnostic accuracy, individualized management, referral pathways, patient's education and reassurance, convenience and comfort, patient's satisfaction, equity and efficiency of the headache care, outcome assessment and safety.

RESULTS

Our study showed that highly experienced headache centres treated their patients in general very well. The centres were content with their work and their patients were content with their treatment. Including disability and quality-of-life evaluations in clinical assessments, and protocols regarding safety, proved problematic: better standards for these are needed. Some centres had problems with follow-up: many specialised centres operated in one-touch systems, without possibility of controlling long-term management or the success of treatments dependent on this.

CONCLUSIONS

This first Europe-wide quality study showed that the quality indicators were workable in specialist care. They demonstrated common trends, producing evidence of what is majority practice. They also uncovered deficits that might be remedied in order to improve quality. They offer the means of setting benchmarks against which service quality may be judged. The next step is to take the evaluation process into non-specialist care (EHF/LTB levels 1 and 2).

Для цитирования: Schramm Sara, Uluduz Derya, Gouveia Raquel Gil, Jensen Rigmor, Siva Aksel, Uygunoglu Ugur, Gvantsa Giorgadze, Mania Maka, Braschinsky Mark, Filatova Elena, Latysheva Nina, Osipova Vera, Skorobogatykh Kirill, Azimova Julia, Straube Andreas, Eren Ozan Emre, Martelletti Paolo, De Angelis Valerio, Negro Andrea, Linde Mattias, Hagen Knut, Radojicic Aleksandra, Zidverc-Trajkovic Jasna, Podgorac Ana, Paemeleire Koen, De Pue Annelien, Lampl Christian, Steiner Timothy J, Katsarava Zaza. Headache service quality: evaluation of quality indicators in 14 specialist-care centres.. The journal of headache and pain. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0707-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.