MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/anc.0b013e3181a68b48

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses · 2009

Pain management during retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations: a systematic review.

Samra Haifa A, McGrath Jacqueline M

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remains a concern for many preterm infants. Early detection and timely treatment have been shown to be effective in improving visual outcomes; moreover, it is crucial that a series of indirect ophthalmic examinations be performed until an infant is considered no longer at risk for the disease. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and evaluate the published evidence regarding characteristics and effectiveness of pain management interventions during the ROP examination. Implications for practice are discussed and suggestions for further research are made. Despite the general consensus that ROP examination is a painful procedure with considerable amount of discomfort, evidence shows that pain management during the ROP examination is inadequate. Although there are currently clear recommendations and guidelines for performing the ROP examination, there are no standard protocols for pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain management during the ROP examination. This is an area where much work is still needed to address the needs of the infant during this critical examination.

Для цитирования: Samra Haifa A, McGrath Jacqueline M. Pain management during retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations: a systematic review.. Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/anc.0b013e3181a68b48.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.