Effects of nursing methods for emergency pci and non-emergency PCI on the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of emergency nursing methods on the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with AMI were divided into emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (group A, 50 cases) and non-emergency PCI control group (group B, 50 cases). The clinical outcome, average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), angina pectoris, heart failure, and reperfusion arrhythmia after myocardial infarction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The average hospitalization days of emergency PCI group were less than those of the control group, and the incidence of angina pectoris and heart failure after myocardial infarction was lower than that of the control group. The average LVEF of emergency PCI group was higher than that of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This shows that emergency nursing of AMI can quickly and efficiently dredge the infarcted artery, reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events after AMI and the average hospitalization days of patients, improve the left ventricular function and prevent heart failure. This method is a very effective treatment for improving the prognosis in patients with AMI.