MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.archger.2011.11.003

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gerontology and geriatrics · 2011

Morbidity in aged Finns: a systematic review.

Salminen Marika, Räihä Ismo, Heinonen Jarna, Kivelä Sirkka-Liisa

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: The aim was to carry out a systematic review of original studies about morbidity in the aged in Finland.

METHODS

Publications with data on morbidity in the aged (≥65 years) in peer-reviewed scientific journals in Finnish and English were systematically searched for in literature databases, websites of National Institute of Health and Welfare (NIHW), National Public Health Institute (NPHI), and Stakes and reference lists of retrieved articles. Publications from 1990 onwards were included.

RESULTS

The search produced 39 publications about morbidity in the aged in Finland fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The most common disease categories in the aged were cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), hypertension, orthostatic hypotension (OH), insomnia, diabetes, articular diseases, diseases causing cognitive decline, and depression. The prevalence of many of these diseases increased with age.

CONCLUSIONS

The morbidity increases with aging, and even the oldest-old are not exceptionally healthy. Because of the increasing number of aged people, the absolute use of health and social services by this population sector will most probably increase in Finland and other developed countries.

Для цитирования: Salminen Marika, Räihä Ismo, Heinonen Jarna, Kivelä Sirkka-Liisa. Morbidity in aged Finns: a systematic review.. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.11.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.