Journal of affective disorders · 2025
Network analysis of the relationship between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms among adolescents: The protective role of resilience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ning Chumei, Lei Hui, Xie Wanwan, Dong Daifeng, Zhang Xiaocui
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Resilience has been shown to buffer the relationship between bullying victimization and depression, though most studies have relied on structural equation modeling. This study, instead, applied network analysis to investigate associations between specific types of bullying victimization and symptoms of depression, and to examine whether resilience moderates these links.
METHODS: A total of 2765 Chinese adolescents completed the Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale - Student (Chinese Revision), the Children's Depression Inventory (Chinese Revision), and the Resilience Scale for Children and Adolescents. Based on resilience scores, 2471 participants were further categorized into a low resilience group (LR group; N = 671, Mage = 15.18, SDage = 1.29, 27.15 %) and a high resilience group (HR group; N = 688, Mage = 15.20, SDage = 1.26, 27.84 %). Separate symptom networks were constructed, and group differences were assessed by comparing network structure and global strength.
RESULTS: (1) The LR group scored significantly higher on bullying victimization and depressive symptoms; (2) The bridge symptom in the LR group was "relational bullying", whereas in the HR group it was "verbal bullying"; (3) The LR group exhibited significantly higher global strength and expected influence values for "negative mood" and "anhedonia", as well as stronger connection between "negative mood" and "interpersonal problems".
LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design prevents causal inference. In addition, retrospective questionnaires may introduce recall bias.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that adolescents with lower resilience exhibit stronger interconnections between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms. Resilience-enhancing interventions may help weaken maladaptive symptom networks in vulnerable youth populations.
METHODS: A total of 2765 Chinese adolescents completed the Delaware Bullying Victimization Scale - Student (Chinese Revision), the Children's Depression Inventory (Chinese Revision), and the Resilience Scale for Children and Adolescents. Based on resilience scores, 2471 participants were further categorized into a low resilience group (LR group; N = 671, Mage = 15.18, SDage = 1.29, 27.15 %) and a high resilience group (HR group; N = 688, Mage = 15.20, SDage = 1.26, 27.84 %). Separate symptom networks were constructed, and group differences were assessed by comparing network structure and global strength.
RESULTS: (1) The LR group scored significantly higher on bullying victimization and depressive symptoms; (2) The bridge symptom in the LR group was "relational bullying", whereas in the HR group it was "verbal bullying"; (3) The LR group exhibited significantly higher global strength and expected influence values for "negative mood" and "anhedonia", as well as stronger connection between "negative mood" and "interpersonal problems".
LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design prevents causal inference. In addition, retrospective questionnaires may introduce recall bias.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that adolescents with lower resilience exhibit stronger interconnections between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms. Resilience-enhancing interventions may help weaken maladaptive symptom networks in vulnerable youth populations.