MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open quality · 2020

Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department.

Baker Mark, Jaeger Cassie, Hafley Carol, Waymack James

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Over 40 000 CT scans are performed in our emergency department (ED) annually and utilisation is over 80% capacity. Improving medical appropriateness of CT scans may reduce total number of scans, time, cost and radiation exposure.

METHODS

Lean Six Sigma methodology was used to improve the process. A National Emergency X-Radiography Utilisation Study (NEXUS)-based PowerForm was implemented in the electronic health record and providers were educated on the criteria.

RESULTS

The rate of potentially medically inappropriate CT C-spine scans decreased from 45% (19/42) to 22% (90/403) (two-proportion test, p=0.002). After the intervention, there was no longer a difference between midlevel providers and physicians in the rate of medically inappropriate orders (19% vs 22%) (two-proportion test, p=0.850) compared with that before the intervention (56% vs 31%) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Overall rates of CT C-spine scans ordered decreased from 69.3 to 62.6/week (t-test, p=0.019).

CONCLUSION

A validated clinical decision-making tool implemented into the medical record can improve quality of care. This study lays a foundation for other imaging studies with validated support tools with similar potential improvements.

Для цитирования: Baker Mark, Jaeger Cassie, Hafley Carol, Waymack James. Appropriate CT cervical spine utilisation in the emergency department.. BMJ open quality. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000844.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.