DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.03.021
Laboratory evidence for hypercoagulability in cirrhotic patients with history of variceal bleeding.
Аннотация
AIM: We aimed to assess the relationship between procoagulant imbalance and the occurrence of variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.
METHODS
We compared the results of chromogenic assay for the functional evaluation of the Protein C anticoagulant pathway (ThromboPath®), thromboelastometry and the levels of factor VII, VIII, and antithrombin in two groups of cirrhotic patients: Group 1 (n = 25) - patients with moderate or large esophageal or gastric varices, who had never experienced acute gastrointestinal bleeding and Group 2 (n = 24) - patients with a history of variceal bleeding.
RESULTS
Despite the differences in MELD score and the results of basic laboratory tests indicating more severe cirrhosis and suggesting a greater risk of bleeding in Group 2, the results of thromboelastometry did not differ significantly between groups. The ThromboPath® test results [ThP B: 67.8 ± 13.4 versus 59.09 ± 12.4%, p = 0.023] and factor VII level [69.04 ± 24.16 vs 53.54 ± 25.06, p = 0.032] confirmed greater plasma procoagulant activity in Group 1 compared to Group 2. However, there were no statistically significant differences in thrombin generation after activation of the protein C. Plasma of patients in Group 2 was more resistant to anticoagulation with protein C compared to Group 1 (PICI%: 65.58 ± 7.24 versus 55.64 ± 13.07%, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The results of our study confirm the lack of influence of coagulation disorders on the occurrence of variceal bleeding. Moreover, the results of ThromboPath® assay indicate hypercoagulability in patients with a history of variceal bleeding and more severe liver cirrhosis, compared to patients who have never bled.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.