Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2006
Whole blood real-time quantitative PCR for cytomegalovirus infection follow-up in transplant recipients.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garrigue Isabelle, Boucher Sébastien, Couzi Lionel, Caumont Anne, Dromer Claire, Neau-Cransac Martine, Tabrizi Reza, Schrive Marie-Hélène, Fleury Hervé, Lafon Marie-Edith
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major opportunistic agent among transplant recipients. While detection of CMV pp65-lower matrix protein (pp65Ag) is still widely used for monitoring CMV infection, real-time PCR assays have been recently developed for routine quantitation of CMV DNA. However, correlations are lacking between results of pp65Ag and quantitative PCR assays and there is no consensus yet as to the more appropriate blood compartment (whole blood (WB), leukocytes, plasma) to be tested with PCR assays.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation.
METHODS: In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR.
RESULTS: Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was <or=2.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: For the routine exploration of a single compartment, whole blood would represent a suitable compromise: easy processing for a sensitive assay. The 3.6 log(10)copies/mL threshold, which could help in identifying active CMV infection, deserves further evaluation.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine, in a population of transplant recipients: (i) the correlation between pp65Ag and CMV quantitative real-time PCR in our setting and (ii) the utility of plasma CMV DNA quantitation in comparison to WB quantitation.
METHODS: In 170 blood samples (from 61 solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients) with pp65Ag results, CMV quantitation was performed in WB and plasma using an in-house real-time quantitative PCR.
RESULTS: Real-time PCR and pp65Ag results in WB were correlated: thresholds of 10 and 50(+) cells/200,000 cells were equivalent to 3.3 log(10)copies/mL (2,000 copies/mL) and 3.8 log(10)copies/mL (6,300 copies/mL), respectively. When WB viral load was >or=3.6 log(10)copies/mL, the risk to have a negative plasma CMV DNA result was <or=2.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: For the routine exploration of a single compartment, whole blood would represent a suitable compromise: easy processing for a sensitive assay. The 3.6 log(10)copies/mL threshold, which could help in identifying active CMV infection, deserves further evaluation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBone Marrow TransplantationCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan TransplantationPhosphoproteinsReference StandardsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityViral LoadViral Matrix Proteins