MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2025.0579

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026

Why aren't they used? Systematic review of barriers to implementation of clinical decision support systems for early cancer detection in primary care.

Derksen Christina, Le Noury Kate A, Akbar Adriana B, Round Thomas, Walter Fiona M, Scott Suzanne E

СтатьяСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Early cancer detection is crucial for patient outcomes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been developed to assist with decision making about screening or symptomatic assessment in primary care, but implementation remains challenging.

AIM: To compare barriers to implementation of cancer-specific CDSSs for screening and symptomatic presentation in primary care.

DESIGN AND

SETTING

Systematic mixed-methods literature review.

METHOD: A subanalysis within a systematic review was conducted. Qualitative and quantitative data on barriers were coded into themes guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Frequencies of studies mentioning barriers were compared between CDSSs for cancer detection and other conditions, and between cancer-specific CDSSs for screening and symptomatic presentation.

RESULTS

In total, 29 cancer-specific CDSSs were identified, addressing screening (n = 15) and symptomatic presentation (n = 14), with a further 70 addressing other conditions. There were minimal differences in barriers for cancer-specific CDSSs and other CDSSs. There were differences between cancer-specific CDSSs for screening and symptomatic presentation. Barriers more frequently reported for CDSSs for symptomatic presentation involved workflow integration (n = 9/14, 64% versus n = 4/15, 27%), medicolegal uncertainty (n = 4/14, 29% versus n = 0/15, 0%), requirements of skills (n = 7/14, 50% versus n = 2/15, 13%), interference with decision-making processes (n = 6/14, 43% versus n = 2/15, 13%), and negative emotions (n = 8/14, 57% versus n = 4/15, 27%).

CONCLUSION

The function and healthcare context of CDSSs in the diagnostic process (symptomatic assessment or screening decision making) appears to be more relevant to implementation than the targeted condition. Involving stakeholders to clarify medicolegal issues and workflow integration is essential for the implementation of CDSSs for symptomatic presentation.

Для цитирования: Derksen Christina, Le Noury Kate A, Akbar Adriana B, Round Thomas, Walter Fiona M, Scott Suzanne E. Why aren't they used? Systematic review of barriers to implementation of clinical decision support systems for early cancer detection in primary care.. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2026. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2025.0579.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.