MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/medicina61122186

Медицинская библиотека · Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025

Equity and Generalizability of Artificial Intelligence for Skin-Lesion Diagnosis Using Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Smartphone Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tjiu Jeng-Wei, Lu Chia-Fang

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background and

Objectives

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising performance in skin-lesion classification; however, its fairness, external validity, and real-world reliability remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy, equity, and generalizability of AI-based dermatology systems across diverse imaging modalities and clinical settings. Materials and

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception-31 October 2025) identified diagnostic accuracy studies using clinical, dermoscopic, or smartphone images. Eighteen studies (11 melanoma-focused; 7 mixed benign-malignant) met inclusion criteria. Six studies provided complete 2 × 2 contingency data for bivariate Reitsma HSROC modeling, while seven reported AUROC values with extractable variance. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and evidence certainty was graded using GRADE.

Results

Across more than 70,000 test images, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% CI 0.74-0.97) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.78), respectively, corresponding to an HSROC AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92). The AUROC-only meta-analysis yielded a similar pooled AUROC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.90). Diagnostic performance was highest in specialist settings (AUROC 0.90), followed by community care (0.85) and smartphone environments (0.81). Notably, performance was lower in darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick IV-VI: AUROC 0.82) compared with lighter skin tones (I-III: 0.89), indicating persistent fairness gaps.

Conclusions

AI-based dermatology systems achieve high diagnostic accuracy but demonstrate reduced performance in darker skin tones and non-specialist environments. These findings emphasize the need for diverse training datasets, skin-tone-stratified reporting, and rigorous external validation before broad clinical deployment.

Для цитирования: Tjiu Jeng-Wei, Lu Chia-Fang. Equity and Generalizability of Artificial Intelligence for Skin-Lesion Diagnosis Using Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Smartphone Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2025. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61122186.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.