Ophthalmology · 2004
Viability of limbal epithelium after anterior lamellar harvesting using a microkeratome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tungsiripat Tulaya, Sarayba Melvin A, Taban Mehran, Sweet Paula M, Osann Kathryn E, Chuck Roy S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the viability in cold eye bank storage of different layers of central and limbal corneal epithelium, including the limbal basal stem cell population, on days 0, 3, 6, and 9 after harvest using a large diameter microkeratome system.
METHODS: Twenty-two human whole globes not suitable for transplantation were obtained from an eye bank (San Diego Eye Bank, San Diego, California) and used for study. Large-diameter anterior corneal discs were prepared using a large diameter microkeratome and stained with calcein AM and an ethidium homodimer to differentiate live from dead cells, respectively. A laser confocal microscope and digital imaging were used to distinguish live (green) from dead (red) cells. Central and limbal epithelial regions were isolated and the middle and basal epithelial sections were cell counted by 3 independent observers. These sections were stored up to 9 days at 4 degrees C in an eye bank corneal storage medium. Differences were tested using nonparametric methods.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of live cells in each of these epithelial layers was determined for up to 9 days in cold eye bank corneal storage medium.
RESULTS: At all time points studied, the better protected basal epithelial layers displayed greater mean viability than the overlying middle epithelial layers. However, the difference was not statistically significant on all days. When comparing the basal epithelial viability of the limbal and central regions, after day 0 in 4 degrees C cold organ culture, the observed viability of the limbal basal epithelium, the purported location of the limbal epithelial stem cell region, was significantly greater than that of the central epithelium. On day 0, median limbal basal versus central basal epithelial viability were 100% (range, 71.7-100%) versus 98.4% (range, 88.9-100%) (P>0.05); on day 3, 100% (range, 64.3-100%) versus 63.4% (range, 13.6-95.5%) (P<0.0005); on day 6, 95.0% (range, 35.0-100%) versus 28.0% (range, 0-92.0%) (P<0.0005); and on day 9, 95.0% (range, 3.7-100%) versus 68.6% (range, 0-100%) (P<0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: After microkeratome harvesting, the limbal basal epithelium is significantly longer lived in cold eye bank storage than central basal epithelium and the middle layers of limbal and central epithelium. This longevity not only bodes well for organ storage of limbal grafts, but also confirms the hardiness of the stem cell region.
METHODS: Twenty-two human whole globes not suitable for transplantation were obtained from an eye bank (San Diego Eye Bank, San Diego, California) and used for study. Large-diameter anterior corneal discs were prepared using a large diameter microkeratome and stained with calcein AM and an ethidium homodimer to differentiate live from dead cells, respectively. A laser confocal microscope and digital imaging were used to distinguish live (green) from dead (red) cells. Central and limbal epithelial regions were isolated and the middle and basal epithelial sections were cell counted by 3 independent observers. These sections were stored up to 9 days at 4 degrees C in an eye bank corneal storage medium. Differences were tested using nonparametric methods.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of live cells in each of these epithelial layers was determined for up to 9 days in cold eye bank corneal storage medium.
RESULTS: At all time points studied, the better protected basal epithelial layers displayed greater mean viability than the overlying middle epithelial layers. However, the difference was not statistically significant on all days. When comparing the basal epithelial viability of the limbal and central regions, after day 0 in 4 degrees C cold organ culture, the observed viability of the limbal basal epithelium, the purported location of the limbal epithelial stem cell region, was significantly greater than that of the central epithelium. On day 0, median limbal basal versus central basal epithelial viability were 100% (range, 71.7-100%) versus 98.4% (range, 88.9-100%) (P>0.05); on day 3, 100% (range, 64.3-100%) versus 63.4% (range, 13.6-95.5%) (P<0.0005); on day 6, 95.0% (range, 35.0-100%) versus 28.0% (range, 0-92.0%) (P<0.0005); and on day 9, 95.0% (range, 3.7-100%) versus 68.6% (range, 0-100%) (P<0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: After microkeratome harvesting, the limbal basal epithelium is significantly longer lived in cold eye bank storage than central basal epithelium and the middle layers of limbal and central epithelium. This longevity not only bodes well for organ storage of limbal grafts, but also confirms the hardiness of the stem cell region.