Hepato-gastroenterology · 2000
Intravenous nutrition with high-dose fat emulsion and amino acids without glucose provision after hepatic resection.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sato M, Watanabe Y, Tokui K, Yamamoto T, Hamada Y, Kohtani T, Kawachi K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Controversy remains regarding the optimal nutrition after hepatic resection. We studied the feasibility and efficacy of an intravenous nutrition with high-dose fat emulsion and amino acids without glucose provision by comparing a glucose-based intravenous nutrition.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty-eight patients received either glucose-intravenous nutrition (glucose-IVN group: glucose, 4.2 g; amino acids, 0.8 g/Kg/day) or high-dose fat emulsion and amino acids without glucose provision (HFHA-IVN group: lipids, 2.2 g; amino acids, 1.6 g/Kg/day) for 7 days after hepatic resection (14 patients in each group). Postoperative changes in biochemical tests and plasma levels and arterial-venous concentration differences of amino acids and total ketone bodies across the leg were compared between the two.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding perioperative patients' characteristics. None of the patients from either group developed any complications. Postoperative glucose levels showed normal in the HFHA-IVN group, but elevated in the glucose-IVN group. Seven of the glucose-IVN group patients required exogenous insulin administration. Lipid levels were decreased in the glucose-IVN group, but remained normal in the HFHA-IVN group. The HFHA-IVN group showed higher amino acid levels, higher amino acid release, and hyperketonemia and vigorous uptake of ketones by skeletal muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that dextrose provision is not essential and the HFHA-IVN provides an alternative to glucose-based intravenous nutrition in patients developing glucose intolerance after hepatic resection.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty-eight patients received either glucose-intravenous nutrition (glucose-IVN group: glucose, 4.2 g; amino acids, 0.8 g/Kg/day) or high-dose fat emulsion and amino acids without glucose provision (HFHA-IVN group: lipids, 2.2 g; amino acids, 1.6 g/Kg/day) for 7 days after hepatic resection (14 patients in each group). Postoperative changes in biochemical tests and plasma levels and arterial-venous concentration differences of amino acids and total ketone bodies across the leg were compared between the two.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding perioperative patients' characteristics. None of the patients from either group developed any complications. Postoperative glucose levels showed normal in the HFHA-IVN group, but elevated in the glucose-IVN group. Seven of the glucose-IVN group patients required exogenous insulin administration. Lipid levels were decreased in the glucose-IVN group, but remained normal in the HFHA-IVN group. The HFHA-IVN group showed higher amino acid levels, higher amino acid release, and hyperketonemia and vigorous uptake of ketones by skeletal muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that dextrose provision is not essential and the HFHA-IVN provides an alternative to glucose-based intravenous nutrition in patients developing glucose intolerance after hepatic resection.