m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The Journal of oral implantology · 2026

Photographic Ridge Width Measurement After 2 Different Alveolar Ridge-Preservation Procedures: Clinical Study Analysis Part III.

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Nagavi Nader Nathan, Blunt Cimara Fortes, Shahrabi-Farahani Shokoufeh, Luepke Paul

Аннотация

This study aimed to photographically compare the ridge width at baseline, immediately postsurgery and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks thereafter after using 2 different ridge-preservation procedures. Part I of this clinical study randomly allocated a total of 26 extraction sites from 17 patients to either study group using a computer-generated randomization assignment software. Only 16 sites were qualified for this final analysis. Group I received a cortico-cancellous allograft bone chip (CCBC) mix and a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) barrier membrane, and group II received a type I bovine Achilles tendon collagen plug with bioactive resorbable calcium apatite crystals (CPCAC). Adobe Photoshop CS3 was used to measure the ridge width at the extraction site at 4 distinct time points: baseline (T0), immediately postoperatively (PO) (T1), 4 weeks PO (T2), and 8 weeks PO (T3). The experimental design was a typical repeated-measures design. Statistical significance was evaluated at p < .0042 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No statistically significant differences were found between groups I and II at any assessment regardless of whether the assessment was expressed as an absolute measurement in millimeters or as a percentage of change from baseline assessed before surgery. However, the percentage of ridge width reduction significantly increased over time within each group when comparing each pair of time points except for the T0-T1 (p < .0001) and T2-T3 (p < .0001) comparisons. The sockets that received CPCAC showed similar ridge width reduction when compared with the group that received CCBC with dPTFE at T3. There was no statistically significant difference in ridge width within each group for both T0-T1 and T2-T3 (p > .0042). However, the percentage of width reduction significantly increased over time within each group, when comparing each 2 time points except for the T0-T1 and T2-T3 comparisons.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты