Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2024
Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy and combined pars plana vitrectomy with phacoemulsification for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A retrospective study about 120 eyes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ben Addou Idrissi Sara, Bengebara Omar, Filali Sadouk Mohammed, Himmich Mohamed, Lahlou Lina, El Ouazzani Taybi Habiba, Moutei Hassan, Bennis Ahmed, Chraibi Fouad, Abdellaoui Meriem, Benatiya Andaloussi Idriss
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and combined PPV with phacoemulsification (PPVCE) surgeries for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and cataract treatment.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 120 diabetic patients who underwent PPV or PPVCE.
RESULTS: The key outcome indicators were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and post-operative complications. The PPVCE group had an average age of 53 years, with 50% females and 50% males. The initial visual acuity (VA) was 1.84 log MAR. In this group, BCVA remained stable or increased in 61 eyes (74%). Regarding the PPV group, the average age was 43 years; 65% were men while 34% were women. The initial VA was 1.83 log MAR; in this group, the VA increased or remained stable in 28 eyes (73%). The evolution of the VA was rather symmetric in the two groups without a significant difference (P = 0.9). Similarly, the occurrence of postoperative complications was comparable for the main complications studied, namely the inflammatory reaction (P = 0.809), ocular hypertension (P = 0.344), corneal edema (P = 0.07), and neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.413). However, there was a decrease in BCVA (three lines) in the PPV group after 6 months of follow-up (P = 0.05) in patients with a clear lens preoperatively and who developed a clinically evident cataract.
CONCLUSION: According to this study, for diabetic patients with severe cataracts and vitreoretinal disease requiring vitrectomy, combining vitrectomy with phacoemulsification as a single surgical intervention may be a suitable therapeutic choice. This approach does not significantly increase the risk of visual impairment or retinopathy development.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 120 diabetic patients who underwent PPV or PPVCE.
RESULTS: The key outcome indicators were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and post-operative complications. The PPVCE group had an average age of 53 years, with 50% females and 50% males. The initial visual acuity (VA) was 1.84 log MAR. In this group, BCVA remained stable or increased in 61 eyes (74%). Regarding the PPV group, the average age was 43 years; 65% were men while 34% were women. The initial VA was 1.83 log MAR; in this group, the VA increased or remained stable in 28 eyes (73%). The evolution of the VA was rather symmetric in the two groups without a significant difference (P = 0.9). Similarly, the occurrence of postoperative complications was comparable for the main complications studied, namely the inflammatory reaction (P = 0.809), ocular hypertension (P = 0.344), corneal edema (P = 0.07), and neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.413). However, there was a decrease in BCVA (three lines) in the PPV group after 6 months of follow-up (P = 0.05) in patients with a clear lens preoperatively and who developed a clinically evident cataract.
CONCLUSION: According to this study, for diabetic patients with severe cataracts and vitreoretinal disease requiring vitrectomy, combining vitrectomy with phacoemulsification as a single surgical intervention may be a suitable therapeutic choice. This approach does not significantly increase the risk of visual impairment or retinopathy development.