Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
Use of Dermal Substitute Matrices for Coverage of Exposed Limb Vascular Repairs: A Literature Review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Makkawi Kareem W, Beaineh Paul T, Habr Natasha T, Ibrahim Amir E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prompt coverage of vascular repairs in the extremities is needed to protect from desiccation and trauma. In the absence of local soft tissues to provide early coverage pending demarcation of the tissues and the zone of injury, there is no clear data in the literature on the ideal coverage method. This article is the first to review the use of dermal substitutes for temporary coverage of extremity vascular repairs pending definitive coverage.
METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature to identify previous articles indexed in PubMed and Ovid using these search terms: [(skin) OR (artificial skin) OR (Integra) OR (dermal substitute) OR (dermal substitute matrix) OR (dermal regeneration) OR (dermal regeneration matrix) OR (dermal regeneration template)] AND [(bypass) OR (graft) OR (vascular surgery) OR (revascularization) OR (salvage) OR (limb salvage) OR (vascular repair) OR (artery repair) OR (arterial repair)] AND [(limb) OR (extremity) OR (leg) OR (arm) OR (vascular injury) OR (amputation)].
RESULTS: Of the 32 articles retrieved for initial review, five case reports with six patients of dermal substitute use for direct coverage of extremity repairs were identified. In all cases, the dermal substitute was able to provide stable coverage pending definitive coverage or was allowed to heal secondarily.
CONCLUSIONS: Dermal substitute matrices are a potential means of temporary coverage of exposed extremity vascular repairs when there is a paucity of local soft tissues pending more definitive coverage.
METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature to identify previous articles indexed in PubMed and Ovid using these search terms: [(skin) OR (artificial skin) OR (Integra) OR (dermal substitute) OR (dermal substitute matrix) OR (dermal regeneration) OR (dermal regeneration matrix) OR (dermal regeneration template)] AND [(bypass) OR (graft) OR (vascular surgery) OR (revascularization) OR (salvage) OR (limb salvage) OR (vascular repair) OR (artery repair) OR (arterial repair)] AND [(limb) OR (extremity) OR (leg) OR (arm) OR (vascular injury) OR (amputation)].
RESULTS: Of the 32 articles retrieved for initial review, five case reports with six patients of dermal substitute use for direct coverage of extremity repairs were identified. In all cases, the dermal substitute was able to provide stable coverage pending definitive coverage or was allowed to heal secondarily.
CONCLUSIONS: Dermal substitute matrices are a potential means of temporary coverage of exposed extremity vascular repairs when there is a paucity of local soft tissues pending more definitive coverage.