Disability and rehabilitation · 2024
An investigation of allied health and medical clinicians' viewpoint on prosthetic rehabilitation and cognition.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dawes Erinn, Bliokas Vida, Hewitt Lyndel, Wilson Val
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To explore the factors that influence clinicians (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, vascular surgeons, and rehabilitation medicine physicians) when prescribing prosthetic rehabilitation. Additionally, the study aimed to gain insight into clinicians' perspectives regarding the role of patient cognition in prosthetic rehabilitation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research constitutes one segment of a broader action research study which was undertaken in 2022. A total of thirty-four key clinicians involved in the amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation pathway within a local health district in Australia were engaged through a combination of group and individual interviews as well as surveys.
RESULTS: Five essential considerations when prescribing prosthetic rehabilitation emerged. These included patient's goals, medical history, quality of life, cognitive abilities, and the support available on discharge. This study also revealed variations in opinions among different disciplines concerning appropriateness of prosthetic rehabilitation for the patient cohort. Despite this, there was a desire to build a consensus around a shared approach of identification for patients and clinicians.
CONCLUSION: The identification of these key pillars for clinician consideration has simplified a complex area of care. These pillars could be used to guide pertinent conversations regarding prosthetic rehabilitation and are closely linked with the patient's cognition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research constitutes one segment of a broader action research study which was undertaken in 2022. A total of thirty-four key clinicians involved in the amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation pathway within a local health district in Australia were engaged through a combination of group and individual interviews as well as surveys.
RESULTS: Five essential considerations when prescribing prosthetic rehabilitation emerged. These included patient's goals, medical history, quality of life, cognitive abilities, and the support available on discharge. This study also revealed variations in opinions among different disciplines concerning appropriateness of prosthetic rehabilitation for the patient cohort. Despite this, there was a desire to build a consensus around a shared approach of identification for patients and clinicians.
CONCLUSION: The identification of these key pillars for clinician consideration has simplified a complex area of care. These pillars could be used to guide pertinent conversations regarding prosthetic rehabilitation and are closely linked with the patient's cognition.