The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2020
Expression of AraC/XylS stress response regulators in two distinct carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae ST89 biotypes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Majewski Piotr, Gutowska Anna, Sacha Pawel, Schneiders Thamarai, Talalaj Mariola, Majewska Paulina, Zebrowska Agnieszka, Ojdana Dominika, Wieczorek Piotr, Hauschild Tomasz, Kowalczuk Oksana, Niklinski Jacek, Radziwon Piotr, Tryniszewska Elzbieta
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The growing incidence of MDR Gram-negative bacteria is a rapidly emerging challenge in modern medicine.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish the role of intrinsic drug-resistance regulators in combination with specific genetic mutations in 11 Enterobacter cloacae isolates obtained from a single patient within a 7 week period.
METHODS: The molecular characterization of eight carbapenem-resistant and three carbapenem-susceptible E. cloacae ST89 isolates included expression-level analysis and WGS. Quantitative PCR included: (i) chromosomal cephalosporinase gene (ampC); (ii) membrane permeability factor genes, e.g. ompF, ompC, acrA, acrB and tolC; and (iii) intrinsic regulatory genes, e.g. ramA, ampR, rob, marA and soxS, which confer reductions in antibiotic susceptibility.
RESULTS: In this study we describe the influence of the alterations in membrane permeability (ompF and ompC levels), intrinsic regulatory genes (ramA, marA, soxS) and intrinsic chromosomal cephalosporinase AmpC on reductions in carbapenem susceptibility of E. cloacae clinical isolates. Interestingly, only the first isolate possessed the acquired VIM-4 carbapenemase, which has been lost in subsequent isolates. The remaining XDR E. cloacae ST89 isolates presented complex carbapenem-resistance pathways, which included perturbations in permeability of bacterial membranes mediated by overexpression of ramA, encoding an AraC/XylS global regulator. Moreover, susceptible isolates differed significantly from other isolates in terms of marA down-regulation and soxS up-regulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular mechanisms of resistance among carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae included production of acquired VIM-4 carbapenemase, significant alterations in membrane permeability due to increased expression of ramA, encoding an AraC/XylS global regulator, and the overproduction of chromosomal AmpC cephalosporinase.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to establish the role of intrinsic drug-resistance regulators in combination with specific genetic mutations in 11 Enterobacter cloacae isolates obtained from a single patient within a 7 week period.
METHODS: The molecular characterization of eight carbapenem-resistant and three carbapenem-susceptible E. cloacae ST89 isolates included expression-level analysis and WGS. Quantitative PCR included: (i) chromosomal cephalosporinase gene (ampC); (ii) membrane permeability factor genes, e.g. ompF, ompC, acrA, acrB and tolC; and (iii) intrinsic regulatory genes, e.g. ramA, ampR, rob, marA and soxS, which confer reductions in antibiotic susceptibility.
RESULTS: In this study we describe the influence of the alterations in membrane permeability (ompF and ompC levels), intrinsic regulatory genes (ramA, marA, soxS) and intrinsic chromosomal cephalosporinase AmpC on reductions in carbapenem susceptibility of E. cloacae clinical isolates. Interestingly, only the first isolate possessed the acquired VIM-4 carbapenemase, which has been lost in subsequent isolates. The remaining XDR E. cloacae ST89 isolates presented complex carbapenem-resistance pathways, which included perturbations in permeability of bacterial membranes mediated by overexpression of ramA, encoding an AraC/XylS global regulator. Moreover, susceptible isolates differed significantly from other isolates in terms of marA down-regulation and soxS up-regulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular mechanisms of resistance among carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae included production of acquired VIM-4 carbapenemase, significant alterations in membrane permeability due to increased expression of ramA, encoding an AraC/XylS global regulator, and the overproduction of chromosomal AmpC cephalosporinase.