Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2017
Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sang Stephane Leung Wai, Beute Tyler, Heiser John, Berkompas Duane, Fanning Justin, Merhi William
Аннотация
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is used increasingly to treat bioprosthetic valve failure. A paucity of data exists regarding valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR in degenerated Freestyle stentless bioprostheses (FSBs). This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of ViV TAVR in previously placed FSB. From October 2014 to September 2016, 22 patients at a single institution underwent ViV TAVR with a self-expanding transcatheter valve for a failing FSB. Patient baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively and entered into a dedicated database. The mean patient age was 74 ± 9 years, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons' Risk score was 9.0 ± 7.4%. Ten patients presented with acute heart failure requiring urgent intervention. The most common mode of failure of the FSB was regurgitation caused by a flail or malcoapting leaflet. Seventeen (77%) patients had a modified subcoronary implantation, 3 (14%) had a full root replacement, and 2 (9%) had a root inclusion. Device success using a self-expanding transcatheter valve was 95%, all via transfemoral approach. The mean implant depth was 7 ± 3 mm. Thirty-day survival was 100%. No patient had more than mild paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days, and the permanent pacemaker rate was 9%. The mean hospital stay after intervention was 5 ± 2 days. ViV TAVR using a self-expanding transcatheter valve is safe, feasible, and can be used successfully to treat a failed FSB. Procedural challenges suggest referral to valve centers of excellence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment Outcome